Literature DB >> 23715943

Methodological assessment of HCC literature.

G Daniele1, N Costa, V Lorusso, J Costa-Maia, I Pache, M Pirisi.   

Abstract

Despite the fact that the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major health problem, very few interventions are available for this disease, and only sorafenib is approved for the treatment of advanced disease. Of note, only very few interventions have been thoroughly evaluated over time for HCC patients compared with several hundreds in other, equally highly lethal, tumours. Additionally, clinical trials in HCC have often been questioned for poor design and methodological issues. As a consequence, a gap between what is measured in clinical trials and what clinicians have to face in daily practice often occurs. As a result of this scenario, even the most recent guidelines for treatment of HCC patients use low strength evidence to make recommendations. In this review, we will discuss some of the potential methodological issues hindering a rational development of new treatments for HCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatocellular carcinoma; methodology; observational studies; randomized, clinical trials; sorafenib

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715943      PMCID: PMC3695643          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  61 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD.

Authors:  François Durand; Dominique Valla
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  General and statistical hierarchy of appropriate biologic endpoints.

Authors:  Daniel Sargent
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Giancarlo Spinzi; Silvia Paggi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs.

Authors:  John R Johnson; Grant Williams; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

7.  Commentary: Sorafenib use in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and underlying Child-Pugh B cirrhosis: evidence and controversy.

Authors:  Andrew X Zhu; Jeffrey W Clark
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2009-01-15

Review 8.  From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Mark D Rothmann; Hong Laura Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction: CALGB 60301.

Authors:  Antonius A Miller; Daryl J Murry; Kouros Owzar; Donna R Hollis; Erin B Kennedy; Ghassan Abou-Alfa; Apurva Desai; Jimmy Hwang; Miguel A Villalona-Calero; E Claire Dees; Lionel D Lewis; Marwan G Fakih; Martin J Edelman; Fred Millard; Richard C Frank; Raymond J Hohl; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.