Literature DB >> 23715922

Concomitant vascular reconstruction during pancreatectomy for malignant disease: a propensity score-adjusted, population-based trend analysis involving 10,206 patients.

Mathias Worni1, Anthony W Castleberry, Bryan M Clary, Beat Gloor, Elias Carvalho, Danny O Jacobs, Ricardo Pietrobon, John E Scarborough, Rebekah R White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the frequency of concomitant vascular reconstructions (VRs) from 2000 through 2009 among patients who underwent pancreatectomy, as well as to compare the short-term outcomes between patients who underwent pancreatic resection with and without VR.
DESIGN: Single-center series have been conducted to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of VR during pancreatic resection. However, its effectiveness from a population-based perspective is still unknown. Unadjusted, multivariable, and propensity score-adjusted generalized linear models were performed.
SETTING: Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 through 2009. PATIENTS: A total of 10,206 patients were involved. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of VR during pancreatic resection, perioperative in-hospital complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Overall, 10,206 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 412 patients (4.0%) underwent VR, with the rate increasing from 0.7% in 2000 to 6.0% in 2009 (P < .001). Patients who underwent pancreatic resection with VR were at a higher risk for intraoperative (propensity score-adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; P = .001) and postoperative (propensity score-adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; P = .008) complications, while the mortality and median length of hospital stay were similar to those of patients without VR. Among the 25% of hospitals with the highest surgical volume, patients who underwent pancreatic surgery with VR had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications and mortality than patients without VR.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of VR during pancreatic surgery is increasing in the United States. In contrast with most single-center analyses, this population-based study demonstrated that patients who underwent VR during pancreatic surgery had higher rates of adverse postoperative outcomes than their counterparts who underwent pancreatic resection only. Prospective studies incorporating long-term outcomes are warranted to further define which patients benefit from VR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715922     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  19 in total

1.  Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bor-Uei Shyr; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and management.

Authors:  Nicole E Lopez; Cristina Prendergast; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bhargava Mullapudi; Patrick J Hawkes; Asish Patel; Chandrakanth Are; Subhasis Misra
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-04

4.  Arterial, but Not Venous, Reconstruction Increases 30-Day Morbidity and Mortality in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sara L Zettervall; Tammy Ju; Jeremy L Holzmacher; Bridget Huysman; Gregor Werba; Anton Sidawy; Paul Lin; Khashayar Vaziri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Explicit vascular reconstruction based on adjacent vector projection.

Authors:  Shaode Yu; Shibin Wu; Zhicheng Zhang; Yili Chen; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 6.  Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Amit Mahipal; Jessica Frakes; Sarah Hoffe; Richard Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

7.  Incidence and management of arterial injuries during pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dyre Kleive; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Ammar Khan; Bjarte Fosby; Pål-Dag Line; Knut Jørgen Labori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Development of Nomograms for Predicting Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer after Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  So Jeong Yoon; Boram Park; Jaewoo Kwon; Chang-Sup Lim; Yong Chan Shin; Woohyun Jung; Sang Hyun Shin; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-07

9.  A Graded Evaluation of Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Mark S Talamonti; Susan J Stocker; Chi-Hsiung Wang; David J Winchester; David J Bentrem; Richard A Prinz; Marshall S Baker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with en bloc portal venous resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Peter Bronsert; Louisa Bolm; Martin Werner; Ulrich T Hopt; Frank Makowiec; Uwe A Wittel; Tobias Keck; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.