OBJECTIVE: To study patients' expectations of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and their subjective perceived outcome, by using qualitative and quantitative methods in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: PD patients were prospectively examined before and 3 months after surgery. Semistructured interviews regarding preoperative expectations and postsurgical subjective perceived outcome were conducted. These were analysed using content analysis. For statistical analyses, patients were classified according to their subjective perceived outcome, resulting in three different subjective outcome groups (negative, mixed, positive outcome). The groups were used for multiple comparisons between and within each group regarding motor impairment, quality of life (QoL), neuropsychiatric status and cognitive functioning, using standard instruments. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to find predictors of subjective negative outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyse cut-off scores for predictive tests. RESULTS: Of the 30 PD patients participating, 8 had a subjective negative outcome, 8 a mixed and 14 a positive outcome. All groups significantly improved in motor functioning. Patients with subjective negative outcome were characterised by preoperative unrealistic expectations, no postsurgical improvement in QoL, and significantly higher presurgical and postsurgical apathy and depression scores. Higher preoperative apathy and depression scores were significant predictors of negative subjective outcome. Cut-off scores for apathy and depression were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-method approach proved useful in examining a patient's subjective perception of STN-DBS outcome. Our results show that significant motor improvement does not necessarily lead to a positive subjective outcome. Moreover, PD patients should be screened carefully before surgery regarding apathy and depression. (DRKS-ID: DRKS00003221).
OBJECTIVE: To study patients' expectations of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and their subjective perceived outcome, by using qualitative and quantitative methods in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS:PDpatients were prospectively examined before and 3 months after surgery. Semistructured interviews regarding preoperative expectations and postsurgical subjective perceived outcome were conducted. These were analysed using content analysis. For statistical analyses, patients were classified according to their subjective perceived outcome, resulting in three different subjective outcome groups (negative, mixed, positive outcome). The groups were used for multiple comparisons between and within each group regarding motor impairment, quality of life (QoL), neuropsychiatric status and cognitive functioning, using standard instruments. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to find predictors of subjective negative outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyse cut-off scores for predictive tests. RESULTS: Of the 30 PDpatients participating, 8 had a subjective negative outcome, 8 a mixed and 14 a positive outcome. All groups significantly improved in motor functioning. Patients with subjective negative outcome were characterised by preoperative unrealistic expectations, no postsurgical improvement in QoL, and significantly higher presurgical and postsurgical apathy and depression scores. Higher preoperative apathy and depression scores were significant predictors of negative subjective outcome. Cut-off scores for apathy and depression were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-method approach proved useful in examining a patient's subjective perception of STN-DBS outcome. Our results show that significant motor improvement does not necessarily lead to a positive subjective outcome. Moreover, PDpatients should be screened carefully before surgery regarding apathy and depression. (DRKS-ID: DRKS00003221).
Entities:
Keywords:
NEUROPSYCHIATRY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PARKINSON'S DISEASE; QUALITY OF LIFE; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY
Authors: A Markser; Franziska Maier; C J Lewis; T A Dembek; D Pedrosa; C Eggers; L Timmermann; E Kalbe; G R Fink; Lothar Burghaus Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Stephanie Cernera; Robert S Eisinger; Joshua K Wong; Kwo Wei David Ho; Janine Lobo Lopes; Kevin To; Samuel Carbunaru; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Leonardo Almeida; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Aysegul Gunduz Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2020-07-06
Authors: J Kuhn; K Hardenacke; D Lenartz; T Gruendler; M Ullsperger; C Bartsch; J K Mai; K Zilles; A Bauer; A Matusch; R-J Schulz; M Noreik; C P Bührle; D Maintz; C Woopen; P Häussermann; M Hellmich; J Klosterkötter; J Wiltfang; M Maarouf; H-J Freund; V Sturm Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Cynthia S Kubu; Scott E Cooper; Andre Machado; Thomas Frazier; Jerrold Vitek; Paul J Ford Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Heather L Benz; Brittany Caldwell; John P Ruiz; Anindita Saha; Martin Ho; Stephanie Christopher; Dawn Bardot; Margaret Sheehan; Anne Donnelly; Lauren McLaughlin; Brennan Mange; A Brett Hauber; Katrina Gwinn; William J Heetderks; Murray Sheldon Journal: MDM Policy Pract Date: 2021-07-02