Literature DB >> 23715817

Administration of intravenous iron complexes on implantable central venous access port in cancer patients in France: the FERPAC survey.

Nicolas Janus1, Florian Scotte, Jean-Baptiste Rey, Sabine Amet, Laurence Rouillon, Lorraine Zakin, Lamine Mahi, Gilbert Deray, Vincent Launay-Vacher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implantable central venous access port (portacath) is used to provide long-term venous access and to deliver chemotherapy in cancer patients. Intravenous iron complexes are frequently prescribed in this setting, and some physicians use a portacath for their administration. The aim of this survey was to assess the frequency of this practice and the reasons supporting it.
METHODS: This declarative survey was conducted in France; 497 oncologists/hematologists were contacted to answer a survey on their practices regarding the administration of intravenous iron via a portacath.
RESULTS: A total of 141 recipients (29.5 %) completed the questionnaire. The intravenous iron complexes most frequently used were iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, and 55.2 % of the responders reported using a portacath to administer intravenous iron complexes. The main reasons mentioned for this practice were ease of administration (27.9 %) and preservation of venous capital (27.6 %). The main reasons reported for not using a portacath to administer intravenous iron were a history of thrombosis (45.1 %) or potential drug interactions (17.7 %). Efficacy and safety were expected to be similar to those observed with peripheral administration. A 47.6 % of physicians declared that they usually did not observe adverse reactions after use of a portacath for iron administration. Intravenous iron administration was always planned after chemotherapy for 46.6 % of the responders and before chemotherapy for 38.2 %, whereas 15.3 % did not have any preference for either option.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous iron complexes (mainly iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose) are commonly administered through a portacath in cancer patients in France. The choice for this route of administration is supported by clinical considerations, but further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23715817     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1845-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

1.  Addition of intravenous iron to epoetin beta increases hemoglobin response and decreases epoetin dose requirement in anemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  M Hedenus; G Birgegård; P Näsman; L Ahlberg; T Karlsson; B Lauri; J Lundin; G Lärfars; A Osterborg
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; M S Aapro; A Courdi; J Foubert; H Link; A Osterborg; L Repetto; P Soubeyran
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 3.  Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury.

Authors:  Sidika Kurul; Pinar Saip; Tulay Aydin
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  The role of intravenous iron in cancer-related anemia.

Authors:  David H Henry
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Hypersensitivity reactions and deaths associated with intravenous iron preparations.

Authors:  George R Bailie; John A Clark; Christi E Lane; Peter L Lane
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  David H Henry; Naomi V Dahl; Michael Auerbach; Simon Tchekmedyian; Leslie R Laufman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-02

8.  Treatment patterns and outcomes in the management of anaemia in cancer patients in Europe: findings from the Anaemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Matti Aapro; Carsten Bokemeyer; Karen Macdonald; Pierre Soubeyran; Matthew Turner; Tara Albrecht; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Authors:  Laurent Bastit; An Vandebroek; Sevilay Altintas; Bernd Gaede; Tamás Pintér; Tamas S Suto; Tony W Mossman; Kay E Smith; Johan F Vansteenkiste
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Chemotherapy-induced anemia at an urban academic medical center: iron studies and supplementation.

Authors:  Stacy S Shord; Sandra Cuellar
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.