| Literature DB >> 23715697 |
Fangzhong Yuan1, Lifeng Yang, Zhuming Zhang, Wenyu Wu, Xiangmei Zhou, Xiaomin Yin, Deming Zhao.
Abstract
Prion diseases characterize a category of fatal neurodegenerative diseases. Although reports have increasingly shown that oxidative stress plays an important role in the progression of prion diseases, little is known about whether oxidative stress is a cause or a consequence of a prion disease. The mechanism of prion disease development also remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate three things: the possible mechanisms of neuron cell damage, the conformation of anti-protease K (PK) PrP(Sc), and the role of oxidative stress in the progression of prion diseases. The study results demonstrated that normal PrP(C) transformed into a PK-resistant protein under oxidative stress in the presence of PrP106-126. Further, the protein misfolding cyclic amplification procedure may have accelerated this process. Mitochondrial damage and dysfunction in prion disease progression were also observed in this study. Our results suggested that neuron cell damage, and particularly mitochondrial damage, was induced by oxidative stress. This damage may be the initial cause of a given prion disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23715697 PMCID: PMC3739867 DOI: 10.1007/s12031-013-0008-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Neurosci ISSN: 0895-8696 Impact factor: 3.444
Fig. 1The PK-resistant PrPC after treatment with ferric ions and PrP106–126. a Ferric ions (final concentrations 300/500 μM) and PrP106–126 (final concentration 50 μM) were diluted into normal brain homogenates for 72 PMCA cycles. The PrPC were tested with 3F4 after digestion with protease K. The control is NBH without treatment by PK. Remnants of PrPC bands showed the PK-resistant property. N2a cells were cultured on cover slips in a six-well plate for 12 h, and then treated with Fe3+ (final concentrations 300/500 μM) and PrP106–126 (final concentration 50 μM) for 12 h. Cells were harvested, lysed, and dissolved in PBS for the Western blot assay. b The mean and standard error for densitometric analyses of blots from different treatment groups. Values are compared to those of the β-actins as fold. * p < 0.05 vs. PrP106–126 treatment only; ** p < 0.01 vs. PrP106–126 treatment
Fig. 2The treated cells were used for measuring ROS release with the DCFH-DA assay, as described in Section “DCFH-DA Assay and Visual Detection.” N2a cells were cultured on cover slips in a 12-well plate for 12 h, then treated with Fe3+ (final concentrations 500 μM) and PrP106–126 (final concentration 50 μM) for 12. a The fluorescence intensity had increased significantly (500 μM Fe3+ + PrP106–126). b Some fluorescence had emerged (300 μM Fe3+ + PrP106–126). c Some fluorescence had emerged (PrP106–126 only). d There is no fluorescence (control)
Fig. 3The NADH dehydrogenase concentrations in mitochondria. The NADH dehydrogenase concentrations were measured using the NADH dehydrogenase quantification kit. The NADH dehydrogenase concentrations of N2a cell mitochondria had decreased in different groups, respectively. * p < 0.05 vs. control; ** p < 0.01 vs. control
Fig. 4Morphometric analyses of mitochondria. N2a cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde, followed by negative staining with 2 % uranyl acetate. All micrographs were caught by transmission electron microscope (TEM) JEM-1230. The arrow shows the mitochondria. The scale bar represents 500 nm