BACKGROUND: Driving for older adults is a matter of balancing independence, safety and mobility, and prematurely relinquishing the car keys can impact morbidity and mortality. Discussions about "when to hang up the keys" are difficult for clinicians, drivers, and family members, and therefore are often avoided or delayed. "Advance Driving Directives" (ADDs) may facilitate conversations between health care providers and older drivers focused on prevention and advance planning for driving cessation. OBJECTIVE: To examine clinician and older driver perspectives on ADDs and driving discussions. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study using iterative focus groups and interviews with clinicians and drivers. PARTICIPANTS: (1) Eight practicing internal medicine physicians, physician assistants or nurse practitioners working at three university-affiliated clinics; and (2) 33 community-dwelling current drivers aged 65 years or older. APPROACH: Theme analysis of semi-structured focus groups and interviews with clinicians and older drivers was used to explore clinician and driver perspectives on "ADDs" and driving conversations. General inductive qualitative techniques were used to identify barriers and facilitators to conversations between older drivers and their healthcare providers about driving and health. KEY RESULTS: Five dominant themes emerged: (1) clinicians usually initiate conversations, but typically not until there are "red flags;" (2) drivers are open to conversations, especially if focused on prevention rather than interventions; (3) family input influences clinicians and drivers; (4) clinical setting factors like short appointments affect conversations; and (5) both clinicians and drivers thought ADDs could be useful in some situations and recommended making general questions about driving a part of routine care. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and older drivers often wait to discuss driving until there are specific "red flags", but both groups support a new framework in which physicians routinely and regularly bring up driving with patients earlier in order to facilitate planning for the future.
BACKGROUND: Driving for older adults is a matter of balancing independence, safety and mobility, and prematurely relinquishing the car keys can impact morbidity and mortality. Discussions about "when to hang up the keys" are difficult for clinicians, drivers, and family members, and therefore are often avoided or delayed. "Advance Driving Directives" (ADDs) may facilitate conversations between health care providers and older drivers focused on prevention and advance planning for driving cessation. OBJECTIVE: To examine clinician and older driver perspectives on ADDs and driving discussions. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study using iterative focus groups and interviews with clinicians and drivers. PARTICIPANTS: (1) Eight practicing internal medicine physicians, physician assistants or nurse practitioners working at three university-affiliated clinics; and (2) 33 community-dwelling current drivers aged 65 years or older. APPROACH: Theme analysis of semi-structured focus groups and interviews with clinicians and older drivers was used to explore clinician and driver perspectives on "ADDs" and driving conversations. General inductive qualitative techniques were used to identify barriers and facilitators to conversations between older drivers and their healthcare providers about driving and health. KEY RESULTS: Five dominant themes emerged: (1) clinicians usually initiate conversations, but typically not until there are "red flags;" (2) drivers are open to conversations, especially if focused on prevention rather than interventions; (3) family input influences clinicians and drivers; (4) clinical setting factors like short appointments affect conversations; and (5) both clinicians and drivers thought ADDs could be useful in some situations and recommended making general questions about driving a part of routine care. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and older drivers often wait to discuss driving until there are specific "red flags", but both groups support a new framework in which physicians routinely and regularly bring up driving with patients earlier in order to facilitate planning for the future.
Authors: Margaret A Perkinson; Marla L Berg-Weger; David B Carr; Thomas M Meuser; Janice L Palmer; Virginia D Buckles; Kimberly K Powlishta; Daniel J Foley; John C Morris Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2005-10
Authors: Jerri D Edwards; Martinique Perkins; Lesley A Ross; Sandra L Reynolds Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Holly Tuokko; Anita Myers; Alexandra Jouk; Shawn Marshall; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Michelle M Porter; Michel Bédard; Isabelle Gélinas; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; Barbara Mazer; Gary Naglie; Mark Rapoport; Brenda Vrkljan Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2013-03-04
Authors: Raymond W Jang; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Frank J Molnar; David B Hogan; Shawn C Marshall; Julie Auger; Ian D Graham; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; George Tomlinson; Matthew E Kowgier; Gary Naglie Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Marian E Betz; Jacqueline Jones; Emma Genco; David B Carr; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Jason S Haukoos; Steven R Lowenstein; Robert Schwartz Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2014-05-02
Authors: Marian E Betz; Leon Villavicencio; Deepika Kandasamy; Tara Kelley-Baker; Woon Kim; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Thelma J Mielenz; David W Eby; Lisa J Molnar; Linda Hill; David Strogatz; David B Carr; Guohua Li Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2019 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Marian E Betz; David B Carr; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Jason S Haukoos; Steven R Lowenstein; Robert Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.562