Literature DB >> 23714933

Patient-reported outcomes after endonasal rhinoplasty for the long nose.

Cemal Cingi1, Sema Zer Toros, Hamdi Cakli, Melek Kezban Gürbüz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long nose with an inferiorly rotated tip commonly results from a discrepancy between tip support and the downward forces of long septum, long upper lateral cartilage, and elongated lower lateral cartilage. Although many techniques have been described for surgical correction, very few studies were designed to include patient-reported outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to introduce our current management of long nose with drooping tips as well as to present the patient-reported outcomes of our case series of endonasal rhinoplasties.
METHODS: This study prospectively analyzed 121 patients who underwent rhinoplasty for the correction of long nose with drooping tips. Study participants completed both a baseline questionnaire before the rhinoplasty operation and a postsurgical patient questionnaire 12 months following the operation, including the European QOL Questionnaire and Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire.
RESULTS: Mean values corresponding to the European QOL Questionnaire visual analog scale score significantly increased after surgery compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Mean values corresponding to self-care (P < 0.01), usual activities (P < 0.05), discomfort (P < 0.01), and anxiety (P < 0.01) showed significant decrease after surgery. A general and significant improvement of the mean Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire scores by rhinoplasty increased from 20.14 ± 7.38 to 82.05 ± 12.8 (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the caudal portion of upper lateral cartilage may correct aesthetic problems in patients with long nose with a drooping tip in which a reduction in the width and the length of middle third of the nose is required. This study suggested an efficient method for aesthetic correction of long nose with the improved patient-reported outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23714933     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829024db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

1.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Charles A East; Stephen B Baker; Lydia Badia; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Comprehensive assessment in cosmetic rhinoplasty: The use of the Derriford Appearance Scale for evaluation of patients.

Authors:  Uma Patnaik; Ajith Nilakantan; Ram Bajpai; Kalyani Addya
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  Quantitative Analysis and Classification of the Nasal Base Using a Parametric Model.

Authors:  Christian H Barnes; Heidi Chen; Jason J Chen; Erica Su; Wesley J Moy; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.