INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in monitoring the response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Articles published in medical and oncologic journals between January 2000 and June 2012 were identified by systematic MEDLINE, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE, and by manual searches of the references listed in original and review articles. Quality of the included studies was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnosis accuracy studies score tool. Meta-DiSc statistical software was used to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC). RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 745 patients were included in the study after meeting the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET or PET/CT were 80.5% (95% CI, 75.9%-84.5%) and 78.8% (95% CI, 74.1%-83.0%), respectively, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 79.8% and 79.5%, respectively. After 1 and 2 courses of chemotherapy, the pooled sensitivity and false-positive rate were 78.2% (95% CI, 73.8%-82.5%) and 11.2%, respectively; and 82.4% (95% CI, 77.4%-86.1%) and 19.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the findings suggests that FDG-PET has moderately high sensitivity and specificity in early detection of responders from nonresponders, and can be applied in the evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in monitoring the response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Articles published in medical and oncologic journals between January 2000 and June 2012 were identified by systematic MEDLINE, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE, and by manual searches of the references listed in original and review articles. Quality of the included studies was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnosis accuracy studies score tool. Meta-DiSc statistical software was used to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC). RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 745 patients were included in the study after meeting the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET or PET/CT were 80.5% (95% CI, 75.9%-84.5%) and 78.8% (95% CI, 74.1%-83.0%), respectively, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 79.8% and 79.5%, respectively. After 1 and 2 courses of chemotherapy, the pooled sensitivity and false-positive rate were 78.2% (95% CI, 73.8%-82.5%) and 11.2%, respectively; and 82.4% (95% CI, 77.4%-86.1%) and 19.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the findings suggests that FDG-PET has moderately high sensitivity and specificity in early detection of responders from nonresponders, and can be applied in the evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Authors: S Di Cosimo; C Campbell; H A Azim; G Galli; G Bregni; G Curigliano; C Criscitiello; M Izquierdo; L de la Pena; D Fumagalli; L Fein; J Vinholes; W M J Ng; M Colleoni; A Ferro; B J Naume; A Patel; J Huober; M J Piccart-Gebhart; J Baselga; E de Azambuja Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Ella F Jones; Kimberly M Ray; Wen Li; Youngho Seo; Benjamin L Franc; Amy J Chien; Laura J Esserman; Miguel H Pampaloni; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.225