Literature DB >> 23714433

Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy.

Muta M Issa1, Usama A Al-Qassab, John Hall, Chad W M Ritenour, John A Petros, Jerry W Sullivan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe a simple and effective method to reduce the risk of infection after prostate biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,642 consecutive prostate biopsy procedures during a 4-year period (2008 to 2012) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria consisted of pre-biopsy negative urine culture, bisacodyl enema and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (3 days). Formalin (10%) was used to disinfect the needle tip after each biopsy core. All patients were monitored for post-biopsy infection. The rate of infection was compared to that of a historical series of 990 procedures. Two ex vivo experiments were conducted to test the disinfectant effectiveness of formalin against fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli, and another experiment was performed to quantitate formalin exposure.
RESULTS: Post-biopsy clinical sepsis with positive urine and blood cultures (quinolone resistant E. coli) developed in 2 patients (0.122%). Both patients were hospitalized, treated with intravenous antibiotics and had a full recovery without long-term sequelae. Mild uncomplicated urinary infection developed in 3 additional patients (0.183%). All were treated with outpatient oral antibiotics and had a complete recovery. The overall rate of urinary infection and sepsis using formalin disinfection was approximately a third of that of a prior series (0.30% vs 0.80%, p=0.13). Ex vivo experiments showed a complete lack of growth of fluoroquinolone resistant E. coli on blood and MacConkey agars after exposure to formalin. The amount of formalin exposure was negligible and well within the safe parameters of the Environmental Protection Agency.
CONCLUSIONS: Formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle after each prostate biopsy core is associated with a low incidence of urinary infection and sepsis. This technique is simple, effective and cost neutral.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVAMC; Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; EPA; Environmental Protection Agency; FQ; PNB; PSA; TP; VA; Veterans Affairs; biopsy; fluoroquinolone; needle; postoperative complications; prostate; prostate needle biopsy; prostate specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; sepsis; targeted prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23714433     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed M Atwa; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A El-Ghar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Abdelwahab Hashem; Yasser Farag; Hashim Farg; Ali Elsorougy; Mohamed Fouda; Hossam Nabeeh; Ahmed Mosbah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Prevention and treatment of biopsy-related complications.

Authors:  Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Dipen Parekh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Infection: formalin needle disinfection reduces sepsis risk of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Melanie Clyne
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections.

Authors:  Robin R Chamberland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Reducing infection rates after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Adrian Pilatz; Przemyslaw Waliszewski; Wolfgang Weidner; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

8.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in the era of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance: prophylaxis with single-dose ertapenem.

Authors:  Michael Seitz; Christian Stief; Raphaela Waidelich; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Rectal swab testing before prostate biopsy: experience in a VA Medical Center urology practice.

Authors:  I Cook; J B Angel; P L Vera; J Demos; D Preston
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.