Literature DB >> 23714263

A comparison of the nutritional quality of organic and conventional ready-to-eat breakfast cereals based on NuVal scores.

Nancy J Woodbury1, Valerie A George1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether there were differences in nutritional quality between organic and conventional ready-to-eat breakfast cereals of similar types, based on NuVal scores.
DESIGN: The current descriptive study analysed NuVal scores for 829 ready-to-eat breakfast cereals and eighteen different cereal types. ANOVA was used to compare the mean NuVal scores of 723 conventional cereals with those of 106 organic cereals.
SETTING: Ready-to-eat breakfast cereals (n 829) with NuVal scores.
SUBJECTS: Not applicable.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in NuVal scores between conventional (mean 28·4 (sd 13·4)) and organic (mean 30·6 (sd 13·2)) cereal types.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers who choose the organic version of a ready-to-eat breakfast cereal believing that nutritional quality is superior may not be making a valid assumption. Public health nutrition educators must help consumers understand that organic cereals are not necessarily more nutritious and their consumption could result in excessive intake of undesirable nutrients, such as fat, sugar and sodium.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23714263     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  1 in total

1.  The Nutritional Quality of Organic and Conventional Food Products Sold in Italy: Results from the Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study.

Authors:  Margherita Dall'Asta; Donato Angelino; Nicoletta Pellegrini; Daniela Martini
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.