BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by renal tubular cell proliferation and dedifferentiation, which may influence tubular secretion of creatinine (CCr[TS]). STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We therefore investigated CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD and controls and studied consequences for the performance of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations. INDEX & REFERENCE TESTS: In patients with ADPKD and healthy controls, we measured GFR as (125)I-iothalamate clearance while simultaneously determining creatinine clearance. OTHER MEASUREMENTS: 24-hour urinary albumin excretion. RESULTS: In 121 patients with ADPKD (56% men; mean age, 40 ± 11 [SD] years) and 215 controls (48% men; mean age, 53 ± 10 years), measured GFR (mGFR) was 78 ± 30 and 98 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively, and CCr(TS) was 15.9 ± 10.8 and 10.9 ± 10.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (P < 0.001). The higher CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD remained significant after adjustment for covariates and appeared to be dependent on mGFR. Correlation and accuracy between mGFR and CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) estimated GFR (eGFR) were 0.95 and 99%, respectively; between mGFR and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study eGFR, they were 0.93 and 97%, respectively. Values for bias, precision, and accuracy were similar or slightly better than in controls. In addition, change in mGFR during 3 years of follow-up in 45 patients with ADPKD correlated well with change in eGFR. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional, single center. CONCLUSIONS: CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD is higher than that in controls, but this effect is limited and observed at only high-normal mGFR. Consequently, the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations perform relatively well in estimating GFR and change in GFR in patients with ADPKD.
BACKGROUND:Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is characterized by renal tubular cell proliferation and dedifferentiation, which may influence tubular secretion of creatinine (CCr[TS]). STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We therefore investigated CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD and controls and studied consequences for the performance of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations. INDEX & REFERENCE TESTS: In patients with ADPKD and healthy controls, we measured GFR as (125)I-iothalamate clearance while simultaneously determining creatinine clearance. OTHER MEASUREMENTS: 24-hour urinary albumin excretion. RESULTS: In 121 patients with ADPKD (56% men; mean age, 40 ± 11 [SD] years) and 215 controls (48% men; mean age, 53 ± 10 years), measured GFR (mGFR) was 78 ± 30 and 98 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively, and CCr(TS) was 15.9 ± 10.8 and 10.9 ± 10.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively (P < 0.001). The higher CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD remained significant after adjustment for covariates and appeared to be dependent on mGFR. Correlation and accuracy between mGFR and CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) estimated GFR (eGFR) were 0.95 and 99%, respectively; between mGFR and MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study eGFR, they were 0.93 and 97%, respectively. Values for bias, precision, and accuracy were similar or slightly better than in controls. In addition, change in mGFR during 3 years of follow-up in 45 patients with ADPKD correlated well with change in eGFR. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional, single center. CONCLUSIONS: CCr(TS) in patients with ADPKD is higher than that in controls, but this effect is limited and observed at only high-normal mGFR. Consequently, the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations perform relatively well in estimating GFR and change in GFR in patients with ADPKD.
Authors: Arlene B Chapman; Olivier Devuyst; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Ron T Gansevoort; Tess Harris; Shigeo Horie; Bertram L Kasiske; Dwight Odland; York Pei; Ronald D Perrone; Yves Pirson; Robert W Schrier; Roser Torra; Vicente E Torres; Terry Watnick; David C Wheeler Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Chengli Shen; Douglas Landsittel; María V Irazabal; Alan S L Yu; Arlene B Chapman; Michal Mrug; Jared J Grantham; Kyongtae T Bae; William M Bennett; Michael F Flessner; Vicente E Torres Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Esther Meijer; Joost P H Drenth; Hedwig d'Agnolo; Niek F Casteleijn; Johan W de Fijter; Tom J Gevers; Peter Kappert; Dorien J M Peters; Mahdi Salih; Darius Soonawala; Edwin M Spithoven; Vicente E Torres; Folkert W Visser; Jack F M Wetzels; Robert Zietse; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: A Lianne Messchendorp; Marco van Londen; Jacob M Taylor; Martin H de Borst; Gerjan Navis; Niek F Casteleijn; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Stephan J L Bakker; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ron T Gansevoort; Mustafa Arici; Thomas Benzing; Henrik Birn; Giovambattista Capasso; Adrian Covic; Olivier Devuyst; Christiane Drechsler; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Francesco Emma; Bertrand Knebelmann; Yannick Le Meur; Ziad A Massy; Albert C M Ong; Alberto Ortiz; Franz Schaefer; Roser Torra; Raymond Vanholder; Andrzej Więcek; Carmine Zoccali; Wim Van Biesen Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 5.992