He-Xin Yan1, Hong-Ping Wu, Hui-Lu Zhang, Charles Ashton, Chang Tong, Han Wu, Qi-Jun Qian, Hong-Yang Wang, Qi-Long Ying. 1. Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at USC, Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: hexiny@yahoo.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops in response to chronic hepatic injury. Although induced cell death is regarded as the major component of p53 tumor-suppressive activity, we recently found that sustained p53 activation subsequent to DNA damage promotes inflammation-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Here we aim at exploring the mechanism linking p53 activation and hepatic inflammation during hepatocarcinogenesis. METHODS: p53(-/-) hepatocytes expressing inducible p53 and primary wild type hepatocytes were treated to induce p53 expression. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for the presence of released inflammatory cytokines. Ethyl pyruvate was used in a rat model of carcinogen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis to examine its effect on p53-dependent chronic hepatic injury, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. RESULTS: Here we show that cytoplasmic translocation and circulating levels of potent inflammatory molecule high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) were greater in wild type rats than in p53(+/-) rats following carcinogen administration. Restoration of p53 expression in p53-null hepatocytes or induction of endogenous p53 in wild type hepatocytes gives rise to the release of HMGB1. Administration of the HMGB1 release inhibitor ethyl pyruvate, which does not affect p53-mediated hepatic apoptosis, substantially prevented carcinogen-induced cirrhosis and tumorigenesis in rat livers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although p53 is usually regarded as a tumor suppressor, its constant activation can promote pro-tumorigenic inflammation, at least in part, via inducing HMGB1 release. Application of HMGB1 inhibitors when restoring p53 in cancer therapy might protect against pro-tumorigenic effects while leaving p53-mediated clearance of malignant cells intact.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops in response to chronic hepatic injury. Although induced cell death is regarded as the major component of p53tumor-suppressive activity, we recently found that sustained p53 activation subsequent to DNA damage promotes inflammation-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. Here we aim at exploring the mechanism linking p53 activation and hepatic inflammation during hepatocarcinogenesis. METHODS:p53(-/-) hepatocytes expressing inducible p53 and primary wild type hepatocytes were treated to induce p53 expression. The supernatants were collected and analyzed for the presence of released inflammatory cytokines. Ethyl pyruvate was used in a rat model of carcinogen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis to examine its effect on p53-dependent chronic hepatic injury, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. RESULTS: Here we show that cytoplasmic translocation and circulating levels of potent inflammatory molecule high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) were greater in wild type rats than in p53(+/-) rats following carcinogen administration. Restoration of p53 expression in p53-null hepatocytes or induction of endogenous p53 in wild type hepatocytes gives rise to the release of HMGB1. Administration of the HMGB1 release inhibitor ethyl pyruvate, which does not affect p53-mediated hepatic apoptosis, substantially prevented carcinogen-induced cirrhosis and tumorigenesis in rat livers. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that although p53 is usually regarded as a tumor suppressor, its constant activation can promote pro-tumorigenic inflammation, at least in part, via inducing HMGB1 release. Application of HMGB1 inhibitors when restoring p53 in cancer therapy might protect against pro-tumorigenic effects while leaving p53-mediated clearance of malignant cells intact.
Authors: Wen Xue; Lars Zender; Cornelius Miething; Ross A Dickins; Eva Hernando; Valery Krizhanovsky; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Scott W Lowe Journal: Nature Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Y Arase; K Ikeda; N Murashima; K Chayama; A Tsubota; I Koida; Y Suzuki; S Saitoh; M Kobayashi; H Kumada Journal: Cancer Date: 1997-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laura A Banaszynski; Ling-Chun Chen; Lystranne A Maynard-Smith; A G Lisa Ooi; Thomas J Wandless Journal: Cell Date: 2006-09-08 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Luis Ulloa; Mahendar Ochani; Huan Yang; Mahira Tanovic; Daniel Halperin; Runkuan Yang; Christopher J Czura; Mitchell P Fink; Kevin J Tracey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Allan Tsung; Rohit Sahai; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Atsunori Nakao; Mitchell P Fink; Michael T Lotze; Huan Yang; Jianhua Li; Kevin J Tracey; David A Geller; Timothy R Billiar Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2005-03-28 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: M Sadeghi; I Lahdou; H Oweira; V Daniel; P Terness; J Schmidt; K-H Weiss; T Longerich; P Schemmer; G Opelz; A Mehrabi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: X Zhao; J Fu; A Xu; L Yu; J Zhu; R Dai; B Su; T Luo; N Li; W Qin; B Wang; J Jiang; S Li; Y Chen; H Wang Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 8.469