Literature DB >> 23714082

Assessment of ventricular repolarization variability with the DeltaT50 method improves identification of patients with congenital long QT syndromes.

Christina Abrahamsson1, Corina Dota, Bo Skallefell, Leif Carlsson, Lars Frison, Anders Berggren, Nils Edvardsson, Göran Duker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We analyzed ventricular repolarization variability in genotyped long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients and in healthy volunteers (HV).
METHOD: The deltaT50, that is, the temporal variability of ventricular repolarization at 50% of the T-wave downslope, was analyzed every 15th minute on 175 and 390 Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings from HV and genotyped LQTS patients, respectively. The average deltaT50 and QTcF were calculated in each subject.
RESULTS: DeltaT50 was 2.26 ± 0.71 ms (mean ± SD) in the HV and 5.74 ± 2.30 ms in the LQTS population (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of QTcF (cutoff value 450 ms) to discriminate between the LQTS patients and the HV were 51.5% and 98.9%, and for deltaT50 (cutoff value 3 ms) 93.9% and 88.6%, respectively. The combination of both variables improved the diagnosis of the LQTS patients even further. Subgroups of LQTS patients at higher risk of cardiac events (with LQTS3, JLN, QTc > 500 ms or symptoms) had higher deltaT50 than subgroups at lower risk (with LQTS1, QTc < 450 ms or without symptoms). The variation in deltaT50 between day and night was concordant with the risk of symptoms; patients with LQTS1 had higher deltaT50 in the daytime and patients with LQTS3 had higher deltaT50 during the night.
CONCLUSION: DeltaT50 more accurately distinguished between LQTS patients and HV than QTcF and was higher in LQTS patients with a higher risk of cardiac events. DeltaT50 can be used together with QTcF to improve the diagnosis in patients with the LQTS phenotype and tentatively also be of value for risk assessment in such patients. ©2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23714082      PMCID: PMC6931957          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  25 in total

1.  Computer-based analysis of dynamic QT changes: toward high precision and individual rate correction.

Authors:  Corina Dota; Bo Skallefell; Nils Edvardsson; Gunnar Fager
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Burst bicycle exercise facilitates diagnosis of latent long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Bruce D Walker; Andrew D Krahn; George J Klein; Allan C Skanes; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  The response of the QT interval to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing: a bedside test for diagnosing long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Sami Viskin; Pieter G Postema; Zahurul A Bhuiyan; Raphael Rosso; Jonathan M Kalman; Jitendra K Vohra; Milton E Guevara-Valdivia; Manlio F Marquez; Evgeni Kogan; Bernard Belhassen; Michael Glikson; Boris Strasberg; Charles Antzelevitch; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Sudden death and ion channel disease: pathophysiology and implications for management.

Authors:  Rachel Bastiaenen; Elijah R Behr
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Long QT syndrome genotyping by electrocardiography: fact, fiction, or something in between?

Authors:  Jørgen K Kanters; Claus Graff; Mads P Andersen; Thomas Hardahl; Egon Toft; Michael Christiansen; Poul Erik Bloch Thomsen; Johannes J Struijk
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Assessing QT prolongation in conscious dogs: validation of a beat-to-beat method.

Authors:  Anthony A Fossa
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  ECG T-wave patterns in genetically distinct forms of the hereditary long QT syndrome.

Authors:  A J Moss; W Zareba; J Benhorin; E H Locati; W J Hall; J L Robinson; P J Schwartz; J A Towbin; G M Vincent; M H Lehmann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Age- and genotype-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmia in the genotyped long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Tomoko Sakaguchi; Wataru Shimizu; Hideki Itoh; Takashi Noda; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Iori Nagaoka; Yuko Oka; Takashi Ashihara; Makoto Ito; Keiko Tsuji; Seiko Ohno; Takeru Makiyama; Shiro Kamakura; Minoru Horie
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26

9.  Utility of treadmill testing in identification and genotype prediction in long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Jorge A Wong; Lorne J Gula; George J Klein; Raymond Yee; Allan C Skanes; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-09

10.  Risk stratification in the long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Silvia G Priori; Peter J Schwartz; Carlo Napolitano; Raffaella Bloise; Elena Ronchetti; Massimiliano Grillo; Alessandro Vicentini; Carla Spazzolini; Janni Nastoli; Georgia Bottelli; Roberta Folli; Donata Cappelletti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Inherited arrhythmias: The cardiac channelopathies.

Authors:  Shashank P Behere; Steven N Weindling
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

Review 2.  Recent developments in using mechanistic cardiac modelling for drug safety evaluation.

Authors:  Mark R Davies; Ken Wang; Gary R Mirams; Antonello Caruso; Denis Noble; Antje Walz; Thierry Lavé; Franz Schuler; Thomas Singer; Liudmila Polonchuk
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 7.851

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.