Literature DB >> 23714006

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma.

Hasan Gokce1, Merih Guray Durak, Mehmet Mustafa Akin, Tulay Canda, Pinar Balci, Hulya Ellidokuz, Binnaz Demirkan, Ilknur Bilkay Gorken, Ali Ibrahim Sevinc, Mehmet Ali Kocdor, Serdar Saydam, Omer Harmancioglu.   

Abstract

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is an uncommon, highly aggressive breast cancer that may occur in pure and mixed forms. Our aim in this study is to investigate the relationship between clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features of pure and mixed IMPC cases diagnosed and treated at our institution. One hundred and three IMPC cases diagnosed at our institution over a period of 19 years have been selected. Clinical, histopathologic features, as well as hormone status and c-erb-B2 overexpression of tumors were re-evaluated. Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared, Kaplan-Meier, and Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analyses. Results were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. Twenty cases (19.4%) were pure, and 83 cases (80.6%) were mixed IMPC. The most common nonmicropapillary invasive carcinoma component in mixed cases was invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; 78.3%). Progesterone receptor was significantly less positive in pure IMPC cases (p = 0.031). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, in terms of mean age of the patients (53.0 versus 52.8), mean tumor size (26.6 mm versus 27.7 mm), presence of high-grade tumor (p = 0.631), presence of sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis (p = 1.000), axillary lymph node metastasis (p = 1.000), lymphatic invasion (p = 1.000) and blood vessel invasion (p = 0.475), c-erbB-2 overexpression of tumor cells (p = 0.616), distant metastasis (p = 0.549), or overall survival (p = 0.759). The local recurrence rate of the two groups was not statistically significant either (16.7% versus 4.3%). However, local recurrence was detected 12% more commonly (p = 0.100), and ~8 months earlier (p = 0.967) in pure IMPC cases, compared to mixed cases. In addition, presence of local recurrence was found to be statistically significantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER) status (p = 0.004), progesterone receptor (PR) status (p = 0.001), and c-erb-B2 overexpression (p = 0.016) in all patients. Overall survival rate was significantly associated with ER staining of the tumor (log-rank = 0.028). Our findings suggest that hormone receptor negativity may explain the more aggressive behavior of pure IMPC compared to mixed cases. Besides, longer survival period of patients with ER positivity, and the relationship of hormone status and c-erb-B2 overexpression and local recurrence further support favorable prognostic value of hormone receptors in invasive breast cancer.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; estrogen receptor; invasive micropapillary carcinoma; progesterone receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23714006     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  16 in total

1.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had poor clinical characteristics but showed no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Guanqiao Li; Shiping Yang; Jia Yao; Zhenping Wang; Guangyu Yao; Mingfeng Liu; Changsheng Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  HER2 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization discordances in invasive breast carcinoma with micropapillary features.

Authors:  Rachel L Stewart; Justin E Caron; Evin H Gulbahce; Rachel E Factor; Katherine B Geiersbach; Erinn Downs-Kelly
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Shen-Li Tang; Ji-Qiao Yang; Zheng-Gui Du; Qiu-Wen Tan; Yu-Ting Zhou; Di Zhang; Qing Lv
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-27

4.  Improving Invasive Breast Cancer Care Using Machine Learning Technology.

Authors:  Clement G Yedjou; Solange S Tchounwou; Jameka Grigsby; Kearra Johnson; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  J Biomed Res Environ Sci       Date:  2022-08-30

5.  The clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of mucinous micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Yangyang Sun; Wenxian Gu; Gengfang Wang; Xiaoli Zhou
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.130

6.  Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  A C Chen; A C Paulino; M R Schwartz; A A Rodriguez; B L Bass; J C Chang; B S Teh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Wu; Ning Zhang; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Histology of Luminal Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ramona Erber; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Clinico-pathological features and prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma: a population-based study from China.

Authors:  Wen-Biao Shi; Lin-Jun Yang; Xin Hu; Jian Zhou; Qiang Zhang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.

Authors:  Hongliang Chen; Kejin Wu; Maoli Wang; Fuwen Wang; Mingdi Zhang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.