BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antagonists of the N-type voltage gated calcium channel (VGCC), Cav 2.2, have a potentially important role in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. ω-conotoxins, such MVIIA and CVID are effective in neuropathic pain models. CVID is reported to have a greater therapeutic index than MVIIA in neuropathic pain models, and it has been suggested that this is due to faster reversibility of binding, but it is not known whether this can be improved further. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the potency of CVID, MVIIA and two intermediate hybrids ([K10R]CVID and [R10K]MVIIA) to reverse signs of neuropathic pain in a rat nerve ligation model in parallel with production of side effects. We also examined the potency and reversibility to inhibit primary afferent synaptic neurotransmission in rat spinal cord slices. KEY RESULTS: All ω-conotoxins produced dose-dependent reduction in mechanical allodynia. They also produced side effects on the rotarod test and in a visual side-effect score. CVID displayed a marginally better therapeutic index than MVIIA. The hybrids had a lesser effect in the rotarod test than either of their parent peptides. Finally, the conotoxins all presynaptically inhibited excitatory synaptic neurotransmission into the dorsal horn and displayed recovery that was largely dependent upon the magnitude of inhibition and not the conotoxin type. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that CVID provides only a marginal improvement over MVIIA in a preclinical model of neuropathic pain, which appears to be unrelated to reversibility from binding. Hybrids of these conotoxins might provide viable alternative treatments.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antagonists of the N-type voltage gated calcium channel (VGCC), Cav 2.2, have a potentially important role in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. ω-conotoxins, such MVIIA and CVID are effective in neuropathic pain models. CVID is reported to have a greater therapeutic index than MVIIA in neuropathic pain models, and it has been suggested that this is due to faster reversibility of binding, but it is not known whether this can be improved further. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the potency of CVID, MVIIA and two intermediate hybrids ([K10R]CVID and [R10K]MVIIA) to reverse signs of neuropathic pain in a rat nerve ligation model in parallel with production of side effects. We also examined the potency and reversibility to inhibit primary afferent synaptic neurotransmission in rat spinal cord slices. KEY RESULTS: All ω-conotoxins produced dose-dependent reduction in mechanical allodynia. They also produced side effects on the rotarod test and in a visual side-effect score. CVID displayed a marginally better therapeutic index than MVIIA. The hybrids had a lesser effect in the rotarod test than either of their parent peptides. Finally, the conotoxins all presynaptically inhibited excitatory synaptic neurotransmission into the dorsal horn and displayed recovery that was largely dependent upon the magnitude of inhibition and not the conotoxin type. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that CVID provides only a marginal improvement over MVIIA in a preclinical model of neuropathic pain, which appears to be unrelated to reversibility from binding. Hybrids of these conotoxins might provide viable alternative treatments.
Authors: Alessandra H Souza; Juliano Ferreira; Marta do Nascimento Cordeiro; Luciene Bruno Vieira; Celio J De Castro; Gabriela Trevisan; Helton Reis; Ivana Assis Souza; Michael Richardson; Marco A M Prado; Vânia F Prado; Marcus Vinicius Gomez Journal: Pain Date: 2008-09-06 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: G Berecki; L Motin; A Haythornthwaite; S Vink; P Bansal; R Drinkwater; C I Wang; M Moretta; R J Lewis; P F Alewood; M J Christie; D J Adams Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Troels S Jensen; Ralf Baron; Maija Haanpää; Eija Kalso; John D Loeser; Andrew S C Rice; Rolf-Detlef Treede Journal: Pain Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Alec B O'Connor; Joseph Audette; Ralf Baron; Geoffrey K Gourlay; Maija L Haanpää; Joel L Kent; Elliot J Krane; Alyssa A Lebel; Robert M Levy; Sean C Mackey; John Mayer; Christine Miaskowski; Srinivasa N Raja; Andrew S C Rice; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett Stacey; Steven Stanos; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Dennis C Turk; Gary A Walco; Christopher D Wells Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Amin Boroujerdi; Hee Kee Kim; Yeoung Su Lyu; Doo-Sik Kim; Katherine W Figueroa; Jin Mo Chung; David Z Luo Journal: Pain Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: J Ekberg; A Jayamanne; C W Vaughan; S Aslan; L Thomas; J Mould; R Drinkwater; M D Baker; B Abrahamsen; J N Wood; D J Adams; M J Christie; R J Lewis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicholas S Adamson Barnes; Vanessa A Mitchell; Nicholas P Kazantzis; Christopher W Vaughan Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 8.739