Literature DB >> 23713511

Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and microperc for treatment of kidney stones in children.

Namık Kemal Hatipoglu1, Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar, Abdulkadir Tepeler, Mehmet Nuri Bodakci, Necmettin Penbegul, Murat Atar, Yasar Bozkurt, Haluk Söylemez, Mesrur Selcuk Silay, Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoğlu, Tolga Akman, Abdullah Armagan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the outcomes of microperc and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of kidney stones in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 145 patients under the age of 15 years with opaque and single kidney stones treated with either SWL or microperc were retrospectively reviewed. Both groups were compared in terms of fluoroscopy and operative time, re-treatment, complications, success rate, and secondary and total number of procedures.
RESULTS: Microperc and SWL were performed on 37 and 108 pediatric patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 5.91±4.03 years (1-15) and 8.43±4.84 (1-15) years in the SWL and microperc groups, respectively (P=0.004). The mean stone size was 11.32±2.84 (5-20) mm in the SWL group and 14.78±5.39 (6-32) mm in the microperc group (P<0.001). In the SWL group, 31 (28.7%) patients underwent a second SWL session and 6 (5%) had a third session. Finally, 95 (88%) patients were stone free at the end of the SWL sessions. In the microperc group, the stone-free rate was 89.2% in a single session (P=0.645). The mean duration of hospitalization was 49.2±12.3 (16-64) hours in the microperc group and 8.4±2.3 (6-10) hours per one session in the SWL group (P<0.001). The fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in the microperc group compared with the SWL group (147.3±95.3 seconds vs 59.6±25.9 seconds, P<0.001). The rate of requirement for an auxiliary procedure was higher in the SWL group than in the microperc group. The overall complication rates for the microperc and SWL groups were 21.6% and 16.7%, respectively (P=0.498).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study demonstrate that microperc provides a similar stone-free rate and a lower additional treatment rate compared with SWL in the treatment of kidney stone disease in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23713511     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Is MICROPERC° really the new frontier of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy?

Authors:  Davide Campobasso; Stefania Ferretti
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Initial experience of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal calculi in 140 renal units.

Authors:  Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Gokhan Atis; Mehmet Nuri Bodakci; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mesrur Selcuk Silay; Mansur Daggulli; Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu; Tuna Karatag; Cenk Gurbuz; Abdullah Armagan; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  "Microperc" micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Arvind P Ganpule; Jaspreet Chabra; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic treatment for urinary stones in pediatric patients: where we are now.

Authors:  Paolo Caione; Giuseppe Collura; Michele Innocenzi; Mauro De Dominicis; Simona Gerocarni Nappo; Nicola Capozza
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

5.  A case of micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with macro complication.

Authors:  Onur Dede; Mazhar Utangaç; Mansur Dağguli; Namık Kemal Hatipoğlu; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Mehmet Nuri Bodakçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-02-18

6.  The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.

Authors:  Vera Y Chung; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mohamed Shoeb; Mahmoud A Mahmoud; Diaa Eldin Mostafa; Mohamed Hasan; Hany M Abdalla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  ROLE OF MICROPERC IN MINIMAL INVASIVE EXTRACTION OF Renal STONES IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  A A Nasir; S K Mishra; A Ahmadi; V Murali; V B Kori; V B Kori; R B Sabnis; M R Desai
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

9.  Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qing He; Kaiwen Xiao; Yuntian Chen; Banghua Liao; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  A Major Complication in Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Upper Calyceal Perforation with Extrarenal Migration of Stone Fragments due to Increased Intrarenal Pelvic Pressure.

Authors:  Fatih Akbulut; Burak Ucpinar; Metin Savun; Onur Kucuktopcu; Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Gokhan Gurbuz
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2015-07-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.