Literature DB >> 23713138

Collective behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum monitored by impedance analysis.

Edith Schäfer1, Dennis Aue, Marco Tarantola, Elena Polo, Christian Westendorf, Noriko Oikawa, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Burkhard Geil, Andreas Janshoff.   

Abstract

Dictyostelium discoideum cells respond to periodic signals of extracellular cAMP by collective changes of cell-cell and cell-substrate contacts. This was confirmed by dielectric analysis employing electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) and impedance measurements involving cell-filled micro channels in conjunction with optical microscopy providing a comprehensive picture of chemotaxis under conditions of starvation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dictyostelium discoideum; cAMP; chemotaxis; impedance analysis; oscillation; starvation

Year:  2013        PMID: 23713138      PMCID: PMC3656020          DOI: 10.4161/cib.23894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Integr Biol        ISSN: 1942-0889


Dictyostelium discoideum (D. discoideum) is an unicellular amoeba in the growth phase that transforms its life form during starvation into a multicellular organism., 10,000–100,000 amoebae develop a fruit body with spores that are able to survive unfavorable conditions. Aggregation is initiated by cell-cell communication through coordinated movement of the individual cells triggered by the chemoattractant cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate (cAMP). Therefore, the chemotaxis of D. discoideum amoebae is regulated by the periodic and synchronous synthesis, secretion, and decomposition of cAMP by the cells, which serves as directional signal for migration. The detection of a cAMP-signal by an amoeba causes further release of cAMP as signal transfer for the nearby cells on the one hand and a polarization of the cell with an extension of pseudopodia in direction of the highest cAMP concentration followed by directional migration in this direction for 2–3 min on the other hand.- By spatiotemporal evolution of the cAMP wave, an emitting center is generated that later serves as an aggregation center., This coordinated and collective behavior of the amoebae can be visualized by dark-field microscopy, or light scattering experiments of suspended D. discoideum cells. The periodic production and release of cAMP can be detected by a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensor measuring the intracellular cAMP concentration and by cAMP-isotope dilution-fluorography, respectively. Chemotaxis of D. discoideum has so far mainly been described by means of optical microscopy providing data on cell shape changes and the velocity of migrating amoebae., However, changes in cell-cell and cell-substrate interactions associated with cAMP oscillations have so far not been addressed. Recently, we established a non-optical method based on time-resolved impedance recordings to detect the collective behavior of a small ensemble of D. discoideum cells during the aggregation phase., The method referred to as electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) essentially measures the dielectric characteristics of the cell bodies in contact with the electrode. The impedance signal is caused by the cells adhering to the working electrode (d = 250 µm; d, diameter) that is located at the bottom of the culture dish serving as the measurement chamber (Fig. 1A). In our previous publication entitled “Collective behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum monitored by impedance analysis,” we found that periodical changes of cell-cell as well as cell-substrate contacts largely explain impedance fluctuations during chemotaxis of amoebae.

Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the experiment comprising electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) setup mounted on top of an optical microscope. The complex impedance between the small working electrode and the large counter electrode is measured with an impedance analyzer (SI 1260). (B) Optical micrograph of a D. discoideum covered gold-electrode. (C) Magnitude of normalized impedance of an ECIS electrode measured at 4 kHz (|Znorm|4kHz) as a function of time. The black box highlights the time period during which collective oscillations occur due to starvation conditions (C, right graph).

Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of the experiment comprising electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) setup mounted on top of an optical microscope. The complex impedance between the small working electrode and the large counter electrode is measured with an impedance analyzer (SI 1260). (B) Optical micrograph of a D. discoideum covered gold-electrode. (C) Magnitude of normalized impedance of an ECIS electrode measured at 4 kHz (|Znorm|4kHz) as a function of time. The black box highlights the time period during which collective oscillations occur due to starvation conditions (C, right graph). Additionally, we used a microfluidic device prepared by micromolding in capillaries, which allowed us to monitor temporal changes in impedance originating from D. discoideum cells filled into the PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) micro channels (h = 18 µm, w = 50 µm, l = 5 mm; h, height; w, width; l, length) equipped with two blackened Pt-electrodes at both ends of the channel (Fig. 2A–D). The setup is conceptionally based on an earlier publication of O’Connor et al.

Figure 2. (A) Microfluidic device prepared by micromolding in capillaries to monitor impedance fluctuations due to cell movements and shape changes within in the micro channel. The two entrances of the channel are equipped with two opposing electrodes. (B) The optical micrographs are taken with an inverted micrograph and show the amoebae dwelling in the channel. (C) Starvation triggers impedance oscillations in micro channel with a similar period as those found in ECIS measurements (blue lines). The zoom-in on the right side has been detrended to emphasize the impedance oscillations. (D) Scheme of the two proposed states that amoebae assume during impedance oscillations. At the impedance maxima the overall contact zone and the cell-cell contacts increase.

Figure 2. (A) Microfluidic device prepared by micromolding in capillaries to monitor impedance fluctuations due to cell movements and shape changes within in the micro channel. The two entrances of the channel are equipped with two opposing electrodes. (B) The optical micrographs are taken with an inverted micrograph and show the amoebae dwelling in the channel. (C) Starvation triggers impedance oscillations in micro channel with a similar period as those found in ECIS measurements (blue lines). The zoom-in on the right side has been detrended to emphasize the impedance oscillations. (D) Scheme of the two proposed states that amoebae assume during impedance oscillations. At the impedance maxima the overall contact zone and the cell-cell contacts increase. In both cases, ECIS and micro channel impedance measurements, after addition of starved cells in a glucose-free buffer the overall impedance increases and non-correlated impedance fluctuations appear caused by migration of the cells. After 3–5 h of cell starvation the impedance signal starts to display oscillations with a defined time period of a few minutes (5–12 min). This oscillation is caused by the characteristic 6 min cycles of cAMP-release and collective chemotaxis of D. discoideum during the aggregation phase. Albeit the biochemical origin of oscillations during chemotaxis is well-understood it remained to be elucidated what morphological changes of the cells are responsible for the observed impedance oscillations. A number of potential contributions to the overall impedance might be envisioned to explain the periodic impedance spikes, for instance, shape/size changes of the cells, clustering and separation of the cells or variations in the cell-substrate distances. Through synchronic bright field (BF)-video recording of the cells on the working electrode during the ECIS measurements, it was possible to find reasons for the oscillation in the impedance signal. Analyzing the occupancy rate of the cells on the electrode does not show periodic changes in the total vertical size of the amoebae. Therefore, changes in the cell covered area do not cause the impedance oscillations. However, periodic changes between roundish and elongated cells are found by determining the circularity of the cells on the electrode over the time. We found that circularity displays the same frequency than impedance oscillation. Yet these changes in the shape of the cells cannot be the reason for the detected impedance spikes because of the phase shift between circularity and impedance signals and the different shape of the spikes. Optical micrographs (BF-images) suggest that a collective process of reversible cell clustering occurs during chemotaxis. Counting the number of isolated D. discoideum amoebae displaying no shared cell-cell boundaries, a periodic formation of 2D clusters is detectable over the time. Each peak of maximum impedance corresponds to a local minimum in isolated cell number. A simple equivalent circuit could show that even with a constant surface coverage larger isolating islands (more clustered cell distribution) produce a higher impedance signal than a homogeneous distribution with smaller islands (single, isolated cell distribution). Therefore, one possible reason for the oscillating impedance signal is periodical changes in lateral cell-cell organization at otherwise constant overall electrode coverage with amoebae. Apart from reversible 2D cluster formation another reason for the occurrence of spikes in the impedance signal was identified and this is temporal and synchronous changes of the distance between cells and substrate. Closer distances of the cells to the electrode produce larger impedance since the ionic flux underneath the cells is restricted to a smaller volume. For analyzing the time dependent variation in cell-substrate distance we used two different methods, quartz crystal microbalance measurements and TIRF (total internal reflection fluorescence) microscopy. Quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (D-QCM) displays variations in cell-substrate distance if dissipation signal and resonance frequency shifts of the acoustic resonator are anti-correlated. The recorded antidromic oscillation of dissipation and resonance frequency with a time period of 6 min some hours after starvation is a clear sign of cells periodically approaching toward and retracting from the substrate in response to the cAMP release cycle. The second method to analyze the cell-substrate distance was TIRF video microscopy with cytosolic GFP-labeled cells. The time dependent overall fluorescence intensity of the recorded images shows oscillation approximately 4 h after cell starvation. The variation of the fluorescence intensity is caused by changes of the detectable cell area in close distance to the surface and not due to changes of the minimal distance between cell and surface. Unfortunately, simultaneous measurements of TIRF and ECIS impedance data are not possible due to the insufficiently transparent gold electrode, which might also quench fluorescence. However, by comparison of simultaneously recorded BF images during ECIS measurements with quasi-simultaneously recorded BF images during recording of TIRF videos it was possible to indirectly correlate ECIS and TIRF time traces. As a consequence, we found that high impedance values correlate with the time point of high fluorescence intensity and therefore with a small overall cell-substrate distance. This makes perfectly sense since impedance increases with decreasing cell-substrate distance. Impedance fluctuations in micro channels are also attributed to changes in 2D clustering and shape changes as well as periodic cell-substrate interactions. Future experiments with simultaneous optical imaging will be necessary to tell apart the different contributions. Taken together, we conclude that impedance measurements in micro channels and on small electrodes are suitable methods to analyze collective behavior of cells in a label-free and non-invasive manner. The detected oscillation in the ECIS impedance signal can be explained by periodic changes of cell-substrate distance and changes in cell aggregation by reversible forming of cell-cell contacts during the chemotaxis of D. discoideum. Due to the similar signal shape and the high signal-to-noise ratio of the TIRF and the QCM measurements that are comparable with the ECIS signal, the dominant source of the observed impedance oscillation in ECIS measurements is probably the periodic change of the overall cell-substrate distance.
  18 in total

1.  Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces.

Authors:  J Wegener; C R Keese; I Giaever
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 2.  Dictyostelium morphogenesis.

Authors:  Cornelis J Weijer
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward.

Authors:  Peter J M Van Haastert; Peter N Devreotes
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Diverse sensitivity thresholds in dynamic signaling responses by social amoebae.

Authors:  C Joanne Wang; Adriel Bergmann; Benjamin Lin; Kyuri Kim; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  An autoregulatory circuit for long-range self-organization in Dictyostelium cell populations.

Authors:  Satoshi Sawai; Peter A Thomason; Edward C Cox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Shape oscillations of Dictyostelium discoideum cells on ultramicroelectrodes monitored by impedance analysis.

Authors:  Edith Schäfer; Christian Westendorf; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Carsten Beta; Burkhard Geil; Andreas Janshoff
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 7.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity.

Authors:  Kristen F Swaney; Chuan-Hsiang Huang; Peter N Devreotes
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

8.  The onset of collective behavior in social amoebae.

Authors:  Thomas Gregor; Koichi Fujimoto; Noritaka Masaki; Satoshi Sawai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Chemotaxis of Dictyostelium discoideum: collective oscillation of cellular contacts.

Authors:  Edith Schäfer; Marco Tarantola; Elena Polo; Christian Westendorf; Noriko Oikawa; Eberhard Bodenschatz; Burkhard Geil; Andreas Janshoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemotactic responses of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae to a cyclic AMP concentration gradient: evidence to support a spatial mechanism for sensing cyclic AMP.

Authors:  T Tani; Y Naitoh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.