Literature DB >> 23712928

Low socioeconomic status and mental health outcomes in colorectal cancer survivors: disadvantage? advantage?... or both?

Michael A Andrykowski1, Mieke J Aarts, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Floortje Mols, Gerrit D Slooter, Melissa S Y Thong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and both positive and negative mental health (MH) outcomes in a population-based sample of colorectal cancer survivors. On the basis of theoretical conceptualizations of trauma and posttraumatic growth, low SES was hypothesized to be positively associated with both greater negative MH outcomes (e.g., distress) and greater positive MH outcomes (e.g., growth).
METHODS: Colorectal cancer survivors (n = 1300; 57% male; mean age 69.4 and 4.0 years post-diagnosis) were recruited using a regional, population-based cancer registry in the Netherlands and completed a questionnaire assessing current negative and positive MH outcomes. Low, medium, and high SES respondents were identified using an area-level indicator of SES based on aggregated individual fiscal data on monetary home value and household income.
RESULTS: Analysis of covariance and logistic regression analyses indicated that low SES was a risk factor for greater negative MH outcomes. Relative to high SES survivors, low SES survivors reported poorer status on nine indices of MH, and high SES survivors were about 50% less likely to report clinically important levels of anxiety and depression. Results provided partial support for the hypothesis low SES was a 'risk' factor for greater positive MH outcomes. Relative to high SES survivors, low SES survivors reported greater positive MH outcomes on 2 of 5 positive MH indices examined (Positive Self-Evaluation, Meaning of Cancer).
CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are the first to suggest that low SES might increase the likelihood of both greater negative as well as positive MH outcomes in cancer survivors.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adjustment; cancer; distress; socioeconomic status; survivor; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712928     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  8 in total

1.  Candidate Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Martijn J L Bours; Bernadette W A van der Linden; Renate M Winkels; Fränzel J van Duijnhoven; Floortje Mols; Eline H van Roekel; Ellen Kampman; Sandra Beijer; Matty P Weijenberg
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-24

2.  Socioeconomic disparities in health-related quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jean A McDougall; Cindy K Blair; Charles L Wiggins; Michael B Goodwin; Vi K Chiu; Ashwani Rajput; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Identifying risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Abigail S Robbertz; David M Weiss; Farrukh T Awan; John C Byrd; Kerry A Rogers; Jennifer A Woyach
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Associations of Household Income with Health-Related Quality of Life Following a Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Varies With Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Jamaica R M Robinson; Amanda I Phipps; Wendy E Barrington; Philip M Hurvitz; Lianne Sheppard; Rachel C Malen; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Prevalence and determinants of depression up to 5 years after colorectal cancer surgery: results from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) study.

Authors:  Lynn Calman; Joshua Turner; Deborah Fenlon; Natalia V Permyakova; Sally Wheelwright; Mubarak Patel; Amy Din; Jane Winter; Alison Richardson; Peter W F Smith; Claire Foster
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.917

6.  Examining relationships between age at diagnosis and health-related quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Christine J Kurian; Amy E Leader; Melissa S Y Thong; Scott W Keith; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Fatigue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol of the Dutch multicentre, longitudinal, observational FAntasTIGUE study.

Authors:  Yvonne M J Goërtz; Milou Looijmans; Judith B Prins; Daisy J A Janssen; Melissa S Y Thong; Jeannette B Peters; Chris Burtin; Yvonne Meertens-Kerris; Arnold Coors; Jean W M Muris; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Emiel F M Wouters; Jan H Vercoulen; Martijn A Spruit
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Disparities in quality of life, social distress and employment outcomes in Australian cancer survivors.

Authors:  Victoria M White; Karolina Lisy; Andrew Ward; Eli Ristevski; Melanie Clode; Kate Webber; Jon Emery; Maarten J Ijzerman; Nina Afshar; Jeremy Millar; Peter Gibbs; Sue Evans; Michael Jefford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.