Literature DB >> 23712301

Current status of core and advanced adult gastrointestinal endoscopy training in Canada: Survey of existing accredited programs.

Xin Xiong1, Alan N Barkun, Kevin Waschke, Myriam Martel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the current status of core and advanced adult gastroenterology training in Canada.
METHODS: A survey consisting of 20 questions pertaining to core and advanced endoscopy training was circulated to 14 accredited adult gastroenterology residency program directors. For continuous variables, median and range were analyzed; for categorical variables, percentage and associated 95% CIs were analyzed.
RESULTS: All 14 programs responded to the survey. The median number of core trainees was six (range four to 16). The median (range) procedural volumes for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively, were 400 (150 to 1000), 325 (200 to 1500), 15 (zero to 250) and 60 (25 to 300). Eleven of 13 (84.6%) programs used endoscopy simulators in their curriculum. Eight of 14 programs (57%) provided a structured advanced endoscopy training fellowship. The majority (88%) offered training of combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The median number of positions offered yearly for advanced endoscopy fellowship was one (range one to three). The median (range) procedural volumes for ERCP, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection, respectively, were 325 (200 to 750), 250 (80 to 400) and 20 (10 to 63). None of the current programs offered training in endoscopic submucosal dissection or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSION: Most accredited adult Canadian gastroenterology programs met the minimal procedural requirements recommended by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology during core training. However, a more heterogeneous experience has been observed for advanced training. Additional studies would be required to validate and standardize evaluation tools used during gastroenterology curricula.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712301      PMCID: PMC3735729          DOI: 10.1155/2013/186284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  38 in total

1.  Training to competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a plea for continuous measuring of objective end points.

Authors:  O W Cass
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Methods of granting hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Douglas O Faigel; Jay L Goldstein; John F Johanson; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Computer simulators: the present and near future of training in digestive endoscopy.

Authors:  Paolo Cantù; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.088

4.  Objective longitudinal performance measurement using the Mayo Colonoscopy Skills Assessment Tool: a step in the right direction.

Authors:  Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  R Enns; J Romagnuolo; T Ponich; J Springer; D Armstrong; A N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Evaluation of colonoscopy skills - how well are we doing?

Authors:  Rachid Mohamed; Abdel Aziz Shaheen; Maitreyi Raman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Fellow perceptions of training using computer-based endoscopy simulators.

Authors:  Jenifer R Lightdale; Adrienne R Newburg; Lisa B Mahoney; Meghan E Fredette; Laurie N Fishman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  GI training: where are we headed?

Authors:  Grace H Elta
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.

Authors:  Adam Haycock; Arjun D Koch; Pietro Familiari; Foke van Delft; Evelien Dekker; Lucio Petruzziello; Jelle Haringsma; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of formal training in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 2.  Technical skills and training of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for new beginners.

Authors:  Seung-Hwa Lee; Young-Kyu Park; Sung-Min Cho; Joon-Koo Kang; Duck-Joo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Resident Survey on Gastroenterology Training in Canada.

Authors:  Brian P H Chan; Michael Fine; Seth Shaffer; Khurram J Khan
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-24

4.  Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BSG trainees' national survey and strategic planning for the future.

Authors:  Sujata Biswas; Laith Alrubaiy; Louise China; Melanie Lockett; Antony Ellis; Neil Hawkes
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-23

5.  Fellowship training: a qualitative study of scope and purpose across one department of medicine.

Authors:  Jolanta Karpinski; Rola Ajjawi; Katherine Moreau
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.