Literature DB >> 23712007

Lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery patients with anticipated difficult airways: a comparison with blind nasal intubation.

Y Dong1, G Li, W Wu, R Su, Y Shao.   

Abstract

In oromaxillofacial surgery patients, the incidence of difficult airways is up to 15.4-16.9%. Blind nasal intubation remains a safe technique for difficult airway management in some remote areas where a fibreoptic bronchoscope is not always available. The lightwand is an easy-to-use, highly economical device, and can facilitate endotracheal intubation through illumination in the neck. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of nasotracheal intubation using lightwand in oromaxillofacial surgery patients with difficult airways. One hundred and sixteen patients with difficult airways requiring nasotracheal intubation were randomly divided into a lightwand group and a blind group, with 58 cases in each group. The first attempt and overall success rates of lightwand intubation were 84.5% and 93.1%, respectively, which were higher than those of blind intubation (65.5% and 75.9%, respectively; P<0.05). The total intubation time was 91.4±27.7s in the lightwand group and 130.7±33.4s in the blind group (P<0.001). Patients in the lightwand group also experienced more stable haemodynamic responses and less pharyngalgia. In conclusion, lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation is superior to blind intubation in patients with difficult airways, with a higher success rate, more stable haemodynamic responses, and fewer postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blind basal intubation; difficult airway; lightwand; nasotracheal intubation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23712007     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  3 in total

1.  Intubation techniques: preferences of maxillofacial trauma surgeons.

Authors:  Mehul R Jaisani; Leeza Pradhan; Balkrishna Bhattarai; Alok Sagtani
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-26

2.  Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for minimizing cardiovascular changes caused by fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kim; Hyun-Wook Jeon; Tae-Kyun Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek; Ji-Uk Yoon; Ji-Young Yoon
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  A comparison of McGrath MAC, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh direct laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yun Jeong Chae; Dae Hee Kim; Eun Jeong Park; Juyeon Oh; In Kyong Yi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.