Literature DB >> 23711810

Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound to predict outcomes in short-length lesions treated with drug-eluting stents.

Young-Won Yoon1, Sanghoon Shin, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Jung-Sun Kim, Dong-Ho Shin, Young-Guk Ko, Donghoon Choi, Dong-Woon Jeon, Hyuckmoon Kwon, Yangsoo Jang, Myeong-Ki Hong.   

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers tomographic images of the coronary artery, helping physicians to refine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in angiographically complex lesions. However, controversy exists regarding whether the routine use of IVUS in short-length lesions leads to improved clinical outcomes after DES implantation. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of IVUS in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization, at 1 year after DES implantation in short-length lesions. The present study was a subanalysis of the REal Safety and Efficacy of a 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation (RESET) study with different clinical outcome parameters. The study population consisted of 662 patients with IVUS guidance and 912 patients with angiography guidance who underwent DES implantation (stent length ≤24 mm). In the IVUS-guided group, adjuvant postdilation was more frequently performed (43.0% vs 34.6%, p <0.001), and the postintervention minimal lumen diameters were greater (2.88 ± 0.44 mm vs 2.72 ± 0.43 mm, p <0.001). MACE occurred in 15 IVUS-guided (2.3%) and 19 angiographically guided (2.1%) patients (p = 0.872). In a subset of patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 292), the MACE rate was 3.4% (n = 4) and 1.7% (n = 3) in the IVUS- and angiographically guided patients, respectively (p = 0.384). The MACE rate in the IVUS- and angiographically guided patients with acute coronary syndrome (n = 601) was 1.1% (n = 3) and 2.7% (n = 9), respectively (p = 0.194). The clinical benefits of IVUS-guided DES implantation compared with angiographically guided DES implantation in short-length lesions could not be confirmed even in patients with clinically high-risk presentations (acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus). In conclusion, routine IVUS guidance does not provide clinical benefits when performing short-length DES implantation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23711810     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound-guided and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials and systematic review.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Tan; Xia-Xia Man; Ling-Yun Liu; Hui Xu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Use of intravascular ultrasound and long-term cardiac death or myocardial infarction in patients receiving current generation drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Sang Yoon Lee; Ki Hong Choi; Young Bin Song; Taek Kyu Park; Joo Myung Lee; Jeong Hoon Yang; Jin-Ho Choi; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Joo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Intravascular Ultrasound-Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis Involving 24,783 Patients.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Bailu Wang; Yu Han; Shukun Sun; Ruijuan Lv; Shujian Wei
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ying Niu; Nan Bai; Ying Ma; Peng-Yu Zhong; Yao-Sheng Shang; Zhi-Lu Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.174

Review 5.  Comparison of intravascular ultrasound guided versus angiography guided drug eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yao-Jun Zhang; Si Pang; Xiao-Yun Chen; Christos V Bourantas; Dao-Rong Pan; Sheng-Jie Dong; Wen Wu; Xiao-Min Ren; Hao Zhu; Shun-Yi Shi; Javaid Iqbal; Bill D Gogas; Bo Xu; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.