BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although cannabinoid CB₂ receptor ligands have been widely characterized in recombinant systems in vitro, little pharmacological characterization has been performed in tissues natively expressing CB₂ receptors. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacology of CB₂ receptor ligands in tissue natively expressing CB₂ receptors (human, rat and mouse spleen) and hCB₂-transfected CHO cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We tested the ability of well-known cannabinoid CB₂ receptor ligands to stimulate or inhibit [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to mouse, rat and human spleen membranes and to hCB₂-transfected CHO cell membranes. cAMP assays were also performed in hCB₂-CHO cells. KEY RESULTS: The data presented demonstrate that: (i) CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and JWH 133 behave as CB₂ receptor full agonists both in spleen and hCB₂-CHO cells, in both [³⁵S]GTPγS and cAMP assays; (ii) JWH 015 behaves as a low-efficacy agonist in spleen as well as in hCB₂-CHO cells when tested in the [³⁵S]GTPγS assay, while it displays full agonism when tested in the cAMP assay using hCB₂-CHO cells; (iii) (R)-AM 1241 and GW 405833 behave as agonists in the [³⁵S]GTPγS assay using spleen, instead it behaves as a low-efficacy inverse agonist in hCB₂-CHO cells; and (iv) SR 144528, AM 630 and JTE 907 behave as CB₂ receptor inverse agonists in all the tissues. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results demonstrate that CB₂ receptor ligands can display differential pharmacology when assays are conducted in tissues that natively express CB₂ receptors and imply that conclusions from recombinant CB₂ receptors should be treated with caution.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although cannabinoid CB₂ receptor ligands have been widely characterized in recombinant systems in vitro, little pharmacological characterization has been performed in tissues natively expressing CB₂ receptors. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacology of CB₂ receptor ligands in tissue natively expressing CB₂ receptors (human, rat and mouse spleen) and hCB₂-transfected CHO cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We tested the ability of well-known cannabinoid CB₂ receptor ligands to stimulate or inhibit [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to mouse, rat and human spleen membranes and to hCB₂-transfected CHO cell membranes. cAMP assays were also performed in hCB₂-CHO cells. KEY RESULTS: The data presented demonstrate that: (i) CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and JWH 133 behave as CB₂ receptor full agonists both in spleen and hCB₂-CHO cells, in both [³⁵S]GTPγS and cAMP assays; (ii) JWH 015 behaves as a low-efficacy agonist in spleen as well as in hCB₂-CHO cells when tested in the [³⁵S]GTPγS assay, while it displays full agonism when tested in the cAMP assay using hCB₂-CHO cells; (iii) (R)-AM 1241 and GW 405833 behave as agonists in the [³⁵S]GTPγS assay using spleen, instead it behaves as a low-efficacy inverse agonist in hCB₂-CHO cells; and (iv) SR 144528, AM 630 and JTE 907 behave as CB₂ receptor inverse agonists in all the tissues. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results demonstrate that CB₂ receptor ligands can display differential pharmacology when assays are conducted in tissues that natively express CB₂ receptors and imply that conclusions from recombinant CB₂ receptors should be treated with caution.
Authors: Brady K Atwood; James Wager-Miller; Christopher Haskins; Alex Straiker; Ken Mackie Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Anna A Karan; Yulia S Spivak; Konstantin A Gerasimov; Elena M Suleymanova; Maria N Volobueva; Alexey A Kvichansky; Lyudmila V Vinogradova; Alexey P Bolshakov Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Kristina L Leinwand; Ashleigh A Jones; Rick H Huang; Paul Jedlicka; Daniel J Kao; Edwin F de Zoeten; Soumita Ghosh; Ruin Moaddel; Jan Wehkamp; Maureen J Ostaff; Jutta Bader; Carol M Aherne; Colm B Collins Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Igor Blaha; Paz Recio; María Pilar Martínez; María Elvira López-Oliva; Ana S F Ribeiro; Ángel Agis-Torres; Ana Cristina Martínez; Sara Benedito; Albino García-Sacristán; Vítor S Fernandes; Medardo Hernández Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240