Literature DB >> 23710944

The experience of pregnant women with a body mass index >30 kg/m² of their encounters with healthcare professionals.

Christina L Lindhardt1, Sune Rubak, Ole Mogensen, Ronald F Lamont, Jan Stener Joergensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the experience of women with a pre-pregnant BMI >30 kg/m², in their encounters with healthcare professionals during pregnancy.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using a phenomenological methodology approach.
SETTING: Face-to-face interviews with pregnant women in their own home who were referred from their general practitioner to specialist antenatal follow-up at their local hospital. SAMPLE: Sixteen women with pre-pregnant BMI >30 kg/m².
METHODS: Qualitative in-depth interviews. Participant's experiences of their encounters with health care professionals were recorded verbatim, transcribed and analysed using a phenomenological approach.
RESULTS: Two main themes were identified, an accusatorial response from healthcare professionals and a lack of advice and helpful information on how being obese and pregnant might affect the women's health and that of their child.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with obesity may experience prejudice from healthcare professionals. These women felt they were treated with a lack of respect, an accusatorial response, and the feeling that information which could have been helpful was not forthcoming. Communication between obese pregnant woman and healthcare professionals appears to be lacking. Improved training in communication skills, less judgemental behaviour and better dissemination of information from healthcare professionals working with pregnant women with obesity are needed.
© 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; healthcare professionals; increased body mass index; motivational interviewing; obesity; phenomenology research; pregnancy; prejudice; stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23710944     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  12 in total

1.  Obese Mothers have Lower Odds of Experiencing Pro-breastfeeding Hospital Practices than Mothers of Normal Weight: CDC Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2008.

Authors:  Laura R Kair; Tarah T Colaizy
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Pregnant women's perceptions of gestational weight gain: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Sujane Kandasamy; Mita Giacomini; Deirdre DeJean; Sarah D McDonald
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Obesity stigma as a determinant of poor birth outcomes in women with high BMI: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Sharon Bernecki DeJoy; Krystle Bittner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-04

4.  Hospital breastfeeding support and exclusive breastfeeding by maternal prepregnancy body mass index.

Authors:  Laura R Kair; Nathan C Nickel; Krista Jones; Katelin Kornfeind; Heather L Sipsma
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Person-centred care in interventions to limit weight gain in pregnant women with obesity - a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellinor K Olander; Marie Berg; Christine McCourt; Eric Carlström; Anna Dencker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Margareta Persson; Ann Lalos; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Being targeted as a "severely overweight pregnant woman" -A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Drude S Lauridsen; Peter Sandøe; Lotte Holm
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Competing priorities: a qualitative study of how women make and enact decisions about weight gain in pregnancy.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Marina Sadik; Sherry Van Blyderveen; Anne Biringer; Wendy Sword; Louis Schmidt; Sarah D Mcdonald
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Beliefs, Barriers, and Preferences of European Overweight Women to Adopt a Healthier Lifestyle in Pregnancy to Minimize Risk of Developing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Explorative Study.

Authors:  Judith G M Jelsma; Karen M van Leeuwen; Nicolette Oostdam; Christopher Bunn; David Simmons; Gernot Desoye; Rosa Corcoy; Juan M Adelantado; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Jürgen Harreiter; Frans Andre van Assche; Roland Devlieger; Dirk Timmerman; David Hill; Peter Damm; Elisabeth R Mathiesen; Ewa Wender-Ozegowska; Agnieszka Zawiejska; Pablo Rebollo; Annunziata Lapolla; Maria G Dalfrà; Stefano Del Prato; Alessandra Bertolotto; Fidelma Dunne; Dorte M Jensen; Lise Lotte T Andersen; Frank J Snoek; Mireille N M van Poppel
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2016-01-14

10.  Perceptions of risk and influences of choice in pregnant women with obesity. An evidence synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Sophie Relph; Melissa Ong; Matias C Vieira; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Jane Sandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.