AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast current nutritional rehabilitation practices against recommendations from National Institute for Health and Excellence guideline Rehabilitation after critical illness (NICE) (2009, http://www.nice.org.uk/cg83). BACKGROUND: Recovery from critical illness has gained increasing prominence over the last decade but there is remarkably little research relating to nutritional rehabilitation. DESIGN: The study is a qualitative study based on patient interviews and observations of ward practice. METHODS: Seventeen patients were recruited into the study at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) of a large teaching hospital in central Scotland in 2011. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on transfer to the ward and weekly thereafter. Fourteen of these patients were followed up at three months post-ICU discharge, and a semi-structured interview was carried out. Observations of ward practice were carried out twice weekly for the duration of the ward stay. RESULTS: Current nutritional practice for post-intensive care patients did not reflect the recommendations from the NICE guideline. A number of organisational issues were identified as influencing nutritional care. These issues were categorised as ward culture, service-centred delivery of care and disjointed discharge planning. Their influence on nutritional care was compounded by the complex problems associated with critical illness. CONCLUSIONS: The NICE guideline provides few nutrition-specific recommendations for rehabilitation; however, current practice does not reflect the nutritional recommendations that are detailed in the rehabilitation care pathway. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nutritional care of post-ICU patients is problematic and strategies to overcome these issues need to be addressed in order to improve nutritional intake.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast current nutritional rehabilitation practices against recommendations from National Institute for Health and Excellence guideline Rehabilitation after critical illness (NICE) (2009, http://www.nice.org.uk/cg83). BACKGROUND: Recovery from critical illness has gained increasing prominence over the last decade but there is remarkably little research relating to nutritional rehabilitation. DESIGN: The study is a qualitative study based on patient interviews and observations of ward practice. METHODS: Seventeen patients were recruited into the study at discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) of a large teaching hospital in central Scotland in 2011. Semi-structured interviews were conducted on transfer to the ward and weekly thereafter. Fourteen of these patients were followed up at three months post-ICU discharge, and a semi-structured interview was carried out. Observations of ward practice were carried out twice weekly for the duration of the ward stay. RESULTS: Current nutritional practice for post-intensive care patients did not reflect the recommendations from the NICE guideline. A number of organisational issues were identified as influencing nutritional care. These issues were categorised as ward culture, service-centred delivery of care and disjointed discharge planning. Their influence on nutritional care was compounded by the complex problems associated with critical illness. CONCLUSIONS: The NICE guideline provides few nutrition-specific recommendations for rehabilitation; however, current practice does not reflect the nutritional recommendations that are detailed in the rehabilitation care pathway. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nutritional care of post-ICU patients is problematic and strategies to overcome these issues need to be addressed in order to improve nutritional intake.
Authors: Lee-Anne S Chapple; Kate Fetterplace; Varsha Asrani; Aidan Burrell; Allen C Cheng; Peter Collins; Ra'eesa Doola; Suzie Ferrie; Andrea P Marshall; Emma J Ridley Journal: Nutr Diet Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Lee-Anne S Chapple; Kate Fetterplace; Varsha Asrani; Aidan Burrell; Allen C Cheng; Peter Collins; Ra'eesa Doola; Suzie Ferrie; Andrea P Marshall; Emma J Ridley Journal: Aust Crit Care Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 3.265
Authors: Jawairia Latif; C Elizabeth Weekes; Anna Julian; Gary Frost; Jane Murphy; Yessica Abigail Tronco-Hernandez; Mary Hickson Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Date: 2021-11-19