Piotr Rutkowski1, Alessandro Gronchi. 1. Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. rutkowskip@coi.waw.pl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article presents the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of adjuvant imatinib mesylate for treating patients with localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and discusses the impact of prolonged treatment with adjuvant imatinib on health care costs. METHODS: A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted to explore recently reported clinical trials demonstrating the clinical benefit of adjuvant imatinib in GISTs, along with analyses discussing the economic impact of adjuvant imatinib. RESULTS: Two phase III trials have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit of adjuvant imatinib treatment in GIST patients at risk of recurrence after tumor resection. Guidelines now suggest adjuvant treatment for at least 3 years in patients at high risk of recurrence. Despite this clinical effectiveness, prolonged use of adjuvant imatinib can lead to an increase in the risk for adverse events and to increased costs for both patients and health care systems. However, the increased cost is partially offset by cost reductions associated with delayed or avoided GIST recurrences. Three years of adjuvant treatment in high-risk patients was concluded to be cost-effective. Therefore, the careful selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment can lead to improved clinical outcomes and significant cost savings. CONCLUSION: Although introducing adjuvant imatinib has an economic impact on health plans, this effect seems to be limited. Several analyses have demonstrated that adjuvant imatinib is more cost-effective for treating localized primary GISTs than surgery alone. In addition, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib is more cost-effective than 1 year of adjuvant therapy.
OBJECTIVE: This article presents the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of adjuvant imatinib mesylate for treating patients with localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and discusses the impact of prolonged treatment with adjuvant imatinib on health care costs. METHODS: A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted to explore recently reported clinical trials demonstrating the clinical benefit of adjuvant imatinib in GISTs, along with analyses discussing the economic impact of adjuvant imatinib. RESULTS: Two phase III trials have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit of adjuvant imatinib treatment in GISTpatients at risk of recurrence after tumor resection. Guidelines now suggest adjuvant treatment for at least 3 years in patients at high risk of recurrence. Despite this clinical effectiveness, prolonged use of adjuvant imatinib can lead to an increase in the risk for adverse events and to increased costs for both patients and health care systems. However, the increased cost is partially offset by cost reductions associated with delayed or avoided GIST recurrences. Three years of adjuvant treatment in high-risk patients was concluded to be cost-effective. Therefore, the careful selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment can lead to improved clinical outcomes and significant cost savings. CONCLUSION: Although introducing adjuvant imatinib has an economic impact on health plans, this effect seems to be limited. Several analyses have demonstrated that adjuvant imatinib is more cost-effective for treating localized primary GISTs than surgery alone. In addition, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib is more cost-effective than 1 year of adjuvant therapy.
Authors: Dian Wang; Qiang Zhang; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Michael C Heinrich; James C Watson; John P Hoffman; Scott Okuno; John M Kane; Margaret von Mehren; Burton L Eisenberg Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Heikki Joensuu; Aki Vehtari; Jaakko Riihimäki; Toshirou Nishida; Sonja E Steigen; Peter Brabec; Lukas Plank; Bengt Nilsson; Claudia Cirilli; Chiara Braconi; Andrea Bordoni; Magnus K Magnusson; Zdenek Linke; Jozef Sufliarsky; Massimo Federico; Jon G Jonasson; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Piotr Rutkowski Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Imran Hassan; Y Nancy You; Roman Shyyan; Eric J Dozois; Thomas C Smyrk; Scott H Okuno; Cathy D Schleck; David O Hodge; John H Donohue Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-11-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Jason S Gold; Mithat Gönen; Antonio Gutiérrez; Javier Martín Broto; Xavier García-del-Muro; Thomas C Smyrk; Robert G Maki; Samuel Singer; Murray F Brennan; Cristina R Antonescu; John H Donohue; Ronald P DeMatteo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Maciej Stanek; Magdalena Pisarska; Dorota Budzyńska; Anna Rzepa; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major; Andrzej Budzyński Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 1.195
Authors: Olivier Bouché; Axel Le Cesne; Maria Rios; Loic Chaigneau; Antoine Italiano; Florence Duffaud; Thierry Lecomte; Dominique Arsène; Sylvain Manfredi; Thomas Aparicio; Stéphane Remy; Nicolas Isambert; Olivier Collard; Frank Priou; François Bertucci; Roland Sambuc; Ségolene Bisot-Locard; Olivier Bourges; Sylvie Chabaud; Jean-Yves Blay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240