Literature DB >> 23709608

Myths and misconceptions about intrauterine contraception among women seeking termination of pregnancy.

Lucy Michie1, Sharon T Cameron, Anna Glasier, Kaye Wellings, Joanna Loudon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate initiation of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) following termination of pregnancy (TOP) is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of another TOP. In spite of its high efficacy, uptake of intrauterine contraception in the UK is low. Myths and misconceptions about the method may contribute to the low uptake. STUDY
DESIGN: Anonymous, self-administered questionnaire among women requesting a TOP in a hospital abortion service in Scotland, UK.
METHODS: Misconceptions about intrauterine contraception were extracted from an online social networking and micro-blogging service, and from existing research to develop a questionnaire containing 12 negative statements about intrauterine contraception. Respondents indicated their level of agreement with each statement.
RESULTS: A total of 106/125 (85%) women requesting a TOP completed the questionnaire. The two commonest negative statements that respondents agreed with were that the IUD/IUS 'Is painful to have inserted' (n=36; 34%) and that 'It can move around inside your body' (n=25; 23.6%). The range of women who neither agreed nor disagreed with negative statements was 26.4-56.0%. Twenty-seven (25%) women indicated that the IUD/IUS was their planned method of post-TOP contraception.
CONCLUSIONS: Although myths about intrauterine contraception persist among a small proportion of women requesting a TOP, lack of knowledge about the method is also evident. The consultation prior to TOP is an important opportunity to provide accurate and quality information to women about the IUD/IUS that may serve to increase uptake and prevent repeat abortions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abortion; intrauterine contraception; intrauterine devices; intrauterine systems; termination of pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709608     DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  10 in total

Review 1.  Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.

Authors:  Marina A S Daniele; John Cleland; Lenka Benova; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lynn L Ngo; Kristy K Ward; Sheila K Mody
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Assessing the experiences of intra-uterine device users in a long-term conflict setting: a qualitative study on the Thailand-Burma border.

Authors:  Jillian Gedeon; Saw Nanda Hsue; Meredith Walsh; Cari Sietstra; Hay MarSan; Angel M Foster
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.723

4.  Contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context.

Authors:  Carrie Purcell; Sharon Cameron; Julia Lawton; Anna Glasier; Jeni Harden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Conceptions of Contraceptive Use in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Lessons for Programming.

Authors:  Catherine Ndinda; Tidings Ndhlovu; Nene Ernest Khalema
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Intrauterine lidocaine and naproxen for analgesia during intrauterine device insertion: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shana M Miles; Katerina Shvartsman; Susan Dunlow
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2019-09-10

7.  Knowledge about the intrauterine device and interest in using it among women users of primary care services.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Vilela Borges; Karina Simão Araújo; Osmara Alves Dos Santos; Renata Ferreira Sena Gonçalves; Elizabeth Fujimori; Eveline do Amor Divino
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-02-14

8.  'Every medicine is part poison': a qualitative inquiry into the perceptions and experiences of choosing contraceptive methods of migrant Chinese women living in Australia.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Mu Li; Deborah Bateson; Rachel Thompson; Chun Wah Michael Tam; Carissa Bonner; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Predictors of non-use of intrauterine contraception among women aged 18-49 years in a general practice setting in the UK.

Authors:  Susan H Walker; Victoria L Newton; Lesley Hoggart; Mike J Parker
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-10-21

10.  Intrauterine device quo vadis? Why intrauterine device use should be revisited particularly in nulliparous women?

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Norman Goldstuck; Thomas Hasskamp; Sohela Jandi; Ansgar Pett
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-01-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.