Literature DB >> 23709425

Robotic mechanical localization of prostate cancer correlates with magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Tae Young Shin1, Yeong Jin Kim, Sey Kiat Lim, Jung Kim, Koon Ho Rha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the concordance of cancer location of the tissue mapping from a mechanical pressure transducer with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 indentations were performed on 5 prostate specimens obtained after radical prostatectomy utilizing a robotic indentation system. The mechanical elastic moduli of suspected malignant lesions were calculated and mapped, and their locations were compared with suspicious areas of malignancy on MRI scans.
RESULTS: The concordance rate between the location mapping from the robotic indentation system and MRI scans results was 90.0% (54/60). The sensitivity and specificity of the robotic indentation system were 87.9% (29/33) and 92.6% (25/27), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 93.5% (29/31) and 93.1% (27/29), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The locations of malignant lesions derived from our robotic indentation system correlated strongly with the locations of suspected areas of malignancy on MRI scans. Our robotic system may provide a more targeted biopsy of the prostate than conventional non-targeted systemic biopsy, possibly improving the diagnostic accuracy of prostatic biopsies for cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI scans; Prostate cancer; diagnosis; elasticity; robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709425      PMCID: PMC3663222          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.4.907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  17 in total

1.  A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response.

Authors:  Evren Samur; Mert Sedef; Cagatay Basdogan; Levent Avtan; Oktay Duzgun
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Vincenzo Scattoni; Alexandre Zlotta; Rodolfo Montironi; Claude Schulman; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads.

Authors:  Jacob Rosen; Jeffrey D Brown; Smita De; Mika Sinanan; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The Vienna nomogram: validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Yan Kit Fong; Michael Dobrovits; Theodore Anagnostou; Christian Seitz; Matthias Waldert; Mike Harik; Sybille Marihart; Michael Marberger; Bob Djavan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Robert L Grubb; S Justin Lee; Marc A Bjurlin; Paul Albert; Anurag K Singh; Iclal Ocak; Peter Choyke; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men.

Authors:  Lester S Borden; Jonathan L Wright; Jason Kim; Kalyan Latchamsetty; Christopher R Porter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?

Authors:  B Djavan; V Ravery; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; M Dobrovits; M Fakhari; C Seitz; M Susani; A Borkowski; L Boccon-Gibod; C C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.

Authors:  Caleb B Bozeman; Brett S Carver; Gloria Caldito; Dennis D Venable; James A Eastham
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  "MRI Stealth" robot for prostate interventions.

Authors:  Dan Stoianovici; Danny Song; Doru Petrisor; Daniel Ursu; Dumitru Mazilu; Michael Muntener; Michael Mutener; Michael Schar; Alexandru Patriciu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.442

10.  Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kyung Kgi Park; Mun Su Chung; Soo Yoon Chung; Joo Hee Kim; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The roles of cellular nanomechanics in cancer.

Authors:  Murali M Yallapu; Kalpana S Katti; Dinesh R Katti; Sanjay R Mishra; Sheema Khan; Meena Jaggi; Subhash C Chauhan
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 12.944

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.