Literature DB >> 23708938

Role of the upper and lowest instrumented vertebrae in predicting the postoperative coronal balance in Lenke 5C patients after selective posterior fusion.

Zhen Liu1, Jing Guo, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Xu Sun, Leilei Xu, Yong Qiu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate which pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters are significantly correlated with the immediate postoperative coronal balance (CB) in Lenke 5C AIS patients, and to identify any radiographic parameter that is correlated with the ultimate CB at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
METHODS: Forty Lenke 5C AIS patients were recruited in the current study. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and the latest follow-up radiographs were reviewed measuring various radiographic parameters related to UIV and LIV. The correlations between different parameters and CB were then studied.
RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 35.2 months. Correlation analysis showed that the following radiographic parameters significantly associated with the immediate postoperative CB in Lenke 5C patients: preoperative CB (r = 0.66, p < 0.01), preoperative UIV translation (r = 0.61, p < 0.01), preoperative LIV tilt (r = 0.61, p < 0.01), postoperative UIV translation (r = 0.51, p < 0.05), and postoperative LIV tilt (r = 0.50, p < 0.05). At the last follow-up, only the final UIV tilt was inversely correlated with the ultimate CB (r = -0.58, p < 0.05). Seven patients presented with coronal imbalance immediately after surgery. However, only one of the seven patients presented with coronal imbalance at the last follow-up, and the other six achieved C7PL-CSVL distance within 10 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: In Lenke 5C patients, preoperative UIV translation and LIV tilt are two important parameters that can predict the immediate postoperative CB. During the postoperative follow-up, UIV tilt may play a very important role in compensating for postoperative coronal imbalance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708938      PMCID: PMC3886519          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2808-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes.

Authors:  Ville Remes; Ilkka Helenius; Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Yrjönen; Mauno Ylikoski; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A study of vertebral rotation.

Authors:  C L Nash; J H Moe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Using side-bending radiographs to determine the distal fusion level in patients with single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior correction with pedicle screws.

Authors:  Hai-Jian Ni; Jia-Can Su; Yang-Hu Lu; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Shi-Sheng He; Da-Jiang Wu; Jin Xu; Chang-Wei Yang; Chuan-Feng Wang; Ying-Chuan Zhao; Ming Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-10

5.  Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Sang-Min Lee; Ewy-Ryong Chung; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Analysis of the lowest instrumented vertebra following anterior spinal fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can we predict postoperative disc wedging?

Authors:  Kotaro Satake; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Kathy M Blanke; Brenda Sides; Karen Steger-May
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine.

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke; Charles C Edwards; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis: an assessment of the Lenke classification.

Authors:  Rolando M Puno; Ki-Chan An; Raquel L Puno; Ashley Jacob; Sung-Soo Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws.

Authors:  Harry L Shufflebarger; Matthew J Geck; Cynthia E Clark
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Can we predict the ultimate lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing a selective fusion with undercorrection of the thoracic curve?

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Lawrence G Lenke; Tim Walton; Michael Peelle; Greg Della Rocca; Karen Steger-May; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Assessment of Coronal Radiographic Parameters of the Spine in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Mohsen Karami; Arash Maleki; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

2.  Coronal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a radiological study after posterior fusion of thoracolumbar/lumbar curves (Lenke 5 or 6).

Authors:  Changwei Yang; Yunfei Zhao; Xiao Zhai; Jingfeng Li; Xiaodong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5/6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with derotation technique.

Authors:  Xiexiang Shao; Wenyuan Sui; Yaolong Deng; Jingfan Yang; Jian Chen; Junlin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lowest instrumented vertebrae selection for selective posterior fusion of moderate thoracolumbar/lumbar idiopathic scoliosis: lower-end vertebra or lower-end vertebra+1?

Authors:  Zhijian Sun; Guixing Qiu; Yu Zhao; Yipeng Wang; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiological factors affecting post-operative global coronal balance in Lenke 5 C scoliosis.

Authors:  Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Subramani Suresh; Siddharth N Aiyer; Rishi Kanna; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

6.  Natural History of Postoperative Adding-On in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Risk Factors for Progressive Adding-On?

Authors:  Xiaodong Qin; Chao Xia; Leilei Xu; Fei Sheng; Huang Yan; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?

Authors:  Ismail Emre Ketenci; Hakan Serhat Yanik; Ayhan Ulusoy; Serdar Demiroz; Sevki Erdem
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Coronal and sagittal balance in Lenke 5 AIS patients following posterior fusion: important role of the lowest instrument vertebrae selection.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Bowen Hu; Yueming Song; Limin Liu; Chunguang Zhou; Zhongjie Zhou; Ganjun Feng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The radiological outcomes of one-stage posterior-only hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion for lumbosacral hemivertebra: a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Zhen Liu; Changzhi Du; Benlong Shi; Xu Sun; Bin Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.