Literature DB >> 23708711

Endoscopic mucosal resection in high- and low-volume centers: a prospective multicentric study.

E Masci1, E Viale, C Notaristefano, B Mangiavillano, G Fiori, C Crosta, M Dinelli, M Maino, P Viaggi, F Della Giustina, V Teruzzi, G Grasso, G Manes, S Zambelli, P A Testoni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective therapeutic technique well-standardized worldwide for the treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasm limited to the mucosal layer. To date, no study has compared technical and clinical differences based on the number of EMRs performed per year. This study aimed to compare EMR technical success, complications, and clinical outcome between low-volume centers (LVCs) and high-volume centers (HVCs). A total of nine endoscopic centers were included in the study.
METHODS: This prospective study investigated consecutive patients with sessile polyps or flat colorectal lesions 1 cm or larger referred for EMR.
RESULTS: A total of 427 lesions were resected in 384 patients at nine endoscopic centers. Males accounted for 60.4% and females for 39.6% of the patients. Most of the EMRs (84.8%) were performed in HVCs and only 15.2% in LVCs. All the lesions were resected in only one session. Argon plasma coagulation was performed on the margins of piecemeal resection in 15.7% of the patients in HVCs only. Complete excision was achieved for 98.6% of the lesions in HVCs and 98.8% of the lesions in LVCs. The complication rate was 4.4% in HVCs and 4.6% in LVCs (p = 0.94). Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.5% of the HVC cases and 3.1% of the LVC cases. Perforation occurred in 1.9% of the HVC cases and 1.5% of the LVC cases (p = 1.00). Recurrences were experienced with 15% of the lesions: 15.5% in HVCs and 14% in LVCs (p = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that EMR can be performed also in LVC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708711     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Surgical strategies for early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  H J Stein; M Feith
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.043

3.  Core curriculum for EMR and ablative techniques.

Authors:  Gordon C Hunt; Walter J Coyle; Shireen A Pais; Douglas G Adler; Barry Degregorio; Christopher J Dimaio; Kulwinder S Dua; Brintha K Enestvedt; Linda S Lee; Lee McHenry; Daniel K Mullady; Elizabeth Rajan; Robert E Sedlack; Vanessa M Shami; William M Tierney; Ashley L Faulx
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Young-Mi Park; Eun Cho; Hye-Young Kang; Jong-Mann Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm.

Authors:  S Tanaka; K Haruma; S Oka; R Takahashi; M Kunihiro; Y Kitadai; M Yoshihara; F Shimamoto; K Chayama
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.

Authors:  Jim C Brooker; Brian P Saunders; Syed G Shah; Catherine J Thapar; Noriko Suzuki; Christopher B Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat colonic adenomas.

Authors:  J Mannath; V Subramanian; R Singh; E Telakis; K Ragunath
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading rectal tumors.

Authors:  S Tamura; K Nakajo; Y Yokoyama; K Ohkawauchi; T Yamada; Y Higashidani; T Miyamoto; H Ueta; S Onishi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; D S Sanders; S S Cross; I Adam; A J Shorthouse; S Brown; K Drew; A J Lobo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  E Bories; C Pesenti; G Monges; B Lelong; V Moutardier; J R Delpero; M Giovannini
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.093

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Multiband mucosectomy for advanced dysplastic lesions in the upper digestive tract.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

2.  Complication and local recurrence rate after endoscopic resection of large high-risk colorectal adenomas of ≥3 cm in size.

Authors:  J Seidel; E Färber; R Baumbach; W Cordruwisch; U Böhmler; B Feyerabend; S Faiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Clinical and financial impacts of introducing an endoscopic mucosal resection service for treatment of patients with large colonic polyps into a regional tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Thomas Worland; Oliver Cronin; Benjamin Harrison; Linda Alexander; Nik Ding; Alvin Ting; Stephanie Dimopoulos; Racheal Sykes; Sina Alexander
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.