Literature DB >> 23708477

Focusing on appraisals: how and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception.

Jingyi Lu1, Xiaofei Xie, Ruogu Zhang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The present research explores how and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception.
METHODS: Based on appraisal tendency framework, researchers hypothesized that anger and fear would influence driving risk perception in opposite directions due to their differences in appraisals.
RESULTS: Study 1 showed that anger reduced risk perception, whereas fear increased it. In Studies 2, 3, and 4, the researchers adopted the paradigm of reappraisal to investigate the causes of the opposite effects found in Study 1. Consistent with our hypothesis, appraisals accounted for these effects: After reappraisals along the dimensions of certainty (Study 2), control (Study 3), and responsibility (Study 4), the different effects between anger and fear on driving risk perception diminished or disappeared. In addition, fearful or angry experience mediated the effects of reappraisals on driving risk perception. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The findings highlight the necessity to differentiate anger and fear in road safety management. Additionally, the current research also provides feasible methods (e.g., certainty, control, or responsibility reappraisal) to intervene in driving risk perception, which is important for driving safety.
Copyright © 2013 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23708477     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  10 in total

1.  Age Differences in Hazard Perception of Drivers: The Roles of Emotion.

Authors:  Faren Huo; Ranran Gao; Cong Sun; Guanhua Hou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Children's fear in traffic and its association with pedestrian decisions.

Authors:  Huarong Wang; Casie Morgan; Dongqian Li; Rong Huang; David C Schwebel
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2020-12-15

3.  The Moderating Effects of Emotions on the Relationship Between Self-Reported Individual Traits and Actual Risky Driving Behaviors.

Authors:  Yaqi Liu; Xiaoyuan Wang; Yongqing Guo
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  Angry Drivers Take Risky Decisions: Evidence from Neurophysiological Assessment.

Authors:  Shuling Li; Tingru Zhang; Ben D Sawyer; Wei Zhang; Peter A Hancock
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Trait driving anger and driving styles among Colombian professional drivers.

Authors:  Sergio A Useche; Boris Cendales; Francisco Alonso; Luis Montoro; Juan C Pastor
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-08

6.  The Effects of the Driver's Mental State and Passenger Compartment Conditions on Driving Performance and Driving Stress.

Authors:  Víctor Corcoba Magaña; Wilhelm Daniel Scherz; Ralf Seepold; Natividad Martínez Madrid; Xabiel García Pañeda; Roberto Garcia
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Negativity Bias in Dangerous Drivers.

Authors:  Jing Chai; Weina Qu; Xianghong Sun; Kan Zhang; Yan Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Threat appeals in health communication: messages that elicit fear and enhance perceived efficacy positively impact on young male drivers.

Authors:  Rachel N Carey; Kiran M Sarma
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Differences in Driving Intention Transitions Caused by Driver's Emotion Evolutions.

Authors:  Yaqi Liu; Xiaoyuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Driving Risk Assessment Using Near-Miss Events Based on Panel Poisson Regression and Panel Negative Binomial Regression.

Authors:  Shuai Sun; Jun Bi; Montserrat Guillen; Ana M Pérez-Marín
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.524

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.