Literature DB >> 23707612

The rat Digit Abduction Score (DAS) assay: a physiological model for assessing botulinum neurotoxin-induced skeletal muscle paralysis.

Ron S Broide1, John Rubino, Gregory S Nicholson, Maria C Ardila, Meenakshi S Brown, K Roger Aoki, Joseph Francis.   

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) are approved for a number of therapeutic indications, including blepharospasm, cervical dystonia and hyperhidrosis, and have also shown efficacy in a variety of pain disorders. The potency of any given BoNT preparation can be routinely assessed by using the Digit Abduction Score (DAS) assay, which measures the local muscle weakening efficacy of BoNT following injection into mouse hindlimb muscle. While most studies have employed mice to assess BoNT efficacy in the DAS, few have utilized rats. In this study, we applied the DAS assay to a rat model and compared the potency of IM-BOTOX(®) (onabotulinumtoxinA) injections between two separate hind limb muscles, gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior (TA). The results demonstrated that the DAS assay can be performed on rats with similar criteria and parameters as for mice. Moreover in the rat, BoNT can be injected into either the gastrocnemius or TA muscle to elicit similar DAS scoring responses. Interestingly, onabotulinumtoxinA potency in the rat DAS was ∼3-fold higher following TA injections than gastrocnemius injections. Additionally, our data showed that the durational kinetics of onabotulinumtoxinA in the rat DAS are approximately twice as long as in the mouse DAS. These results position the rat DAS as a more flexible model for examining the mechanisms of BoNT diffusion and muscle paralysis, while mouse DAS can be used for physiological screening of BoNT because of the potential for higher throughput. Overall, these data confirm the utility of the DAS assay for characterizing the physiological potency of BoNT and related compounds.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BoNT; Botulinum neurotoxin; DAS; Digit Abduction Score; Gastrocnemius muscle; LABORAS; Laboratory Animal Behavior Observation, Registration and Analysis System; OnabotulinumtoxinA; TA; Tibialis anterior muscle; botulinum neurotoxin; tibialis anterior

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707612     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  20 in total

1.  Evidence for central antispastic effect of botulinum toxin type A.

Authors:  Ivica Matak
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Comparative functional analysis of mice after local injection with botulinum neurotoxin A1, A2, A6, and B1 by catwalk analysis.

Authors:  Molly S Moritz; William H Tepp; Heather N'te Inzalaco; Eric A Johnson; Sabine Pellett
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Symptomatic treatment of botulism with a clinically approved small molecule.

Authors:  Edwin Vazquez-Cintron; James Machamer; Celinia Ondeck; Kathleen Pagarigan; Brittany Winner; Paige Bodner; Kyle Kelly; M Ross Pennington; Patrick McNutt
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-01-30

Review 4.  On botulinum neurotoxin variability.

Authors:  Cesare Montecucco; Maria Berica Rasotto
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  The use of the dynamic weight bearing test to assess the effects of acute, intramuscularly administered botulinum neurotoxin type A1 in rats.

Authors:  Sylvie Cornet; Cindy Périer; Stéphanie Wagner; Emile Andriambeloson; Bruno Pouzet; Mikhail Kalinichev
Journal:  Toxicon X       Date:  2020-05-23

6.  Snake and Spider Toxins Induce a Rapid Recovery of Function of Botulinum Neurotoxin Paralysed Neuromuscular Junction.

Authors:  Elisa Duregotti; Giulia Zanetti; Michele Scorzeto; Aram Megighian; Cesare Montecucco; Marco Pirazzini; Michela Rigoni
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Injection of high dose botulinum-toxin A leads to impaired skeletal muscle function and damage of the fibrilar and non-fibrilar structures.

Authors:  Jessica Pingel; Mikkel Schou Nielsen; Torsten Lauridsen; Kristian Rix; Martin Bech; Tine Alkjaer; Ida Torp Andersen; Jens Bo Nielsen; R Feidenhansl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SiMa Cells for a Serotype Specific and Sensitive Cell-Based Neutralization Test for Botulinum Toxin A and E.

Authors:  Nicola Bak; Shalini Rajagopal; Paul Stickings; Dorothea Sesardic
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Augmentation of VAMP-catalytic activity of botulinum neurotoxin serotype B does not result in increased potency in physiological systems.

Authors:  Mark Elliott; Jacquie Maignel; Sai Man Liu; Christine Favre-Guilmard; Imran Mir; Paul Farrow; Fraser Hornby; Sandra Marlin; Shilpa Palan; Matthew Beard; Johannes Krupp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  OnabotulinumtoxinA Displays Greater Biological Activity Compared to IncobotulinumtoxinA, Demonstrating Non-Interchangeability in Both In Vitro and In Vivo Assays.

Authors:  David Rupp; Greg Nicholson; David Canty; Joanne Wang; Catherine Rhéaume; Linh Le; Lance E Steward; Mark Washburn; Birgitte P Jacky; Ron S Broide; Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston; Mitchell F Brin; Amy Brideau-Andersen
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.