Literature DB >> 23707589

Sensitivity of BOLD response to increasing visual contrast: spin echo versus gradient echo EPI.

Piero Chiacchiaretta1, Gian Luca Romani, Antonio Ferretti.   

Abstract

Previous evidence showed that spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, possibly providing a more accurate estimate of the amplitude of neuronal activity. However there is no evidence that the two sequences differ in representing different activation levels due to changes in stimulus intensity. In this study at 3T we compared GE and SE BOLD responses to visual stimuli at increasing contrast levels (5%, 20%, 60%, and 100%). Both sequences showed a monotonic increase of the BOLD response with stimulus contrast. While the larger sensitivity of GE yielded overall larger signal changes, step-wise increase in activation for GE was significant only when comparing 20% with 5% contrast, whereas for SE a significant increase was observed also when comparing 60% with 20% contrast. Moreover, BOLD responses normalized to the lowest contrast showed that relative increases of SE fMRI signal with increasing stimulus strength are larger with respect to the corresponding values of GE signal. This difference was observed also when excluding voxels attributed to large vessels, suggesting a non negligible role of the extravascular contribution to the modulation of SE fMRI signal with stimulus intensity. These results are shown to be in agreement with theoretical predictions that we derived from a recently proposed model of GE and SE functional signals. The present findings suggest that, despite the limited increase in functional localization accuracy at low field, SE fMRI might offer a potential advantage in distinguishing different levels of stimulus-evoked brain activity.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  BOLD contrast; Spin-echo; Stimulus intensity; Visual area

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707589     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Separating slow BOLD from non-BOLD baseline drifts using multi-echo fMRI.

Authors:  Jennifer W Evans; Prantik Kundu; Silvina G Horovitz; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Frequency-dependent tACS modulation of BOLD signal during rhythmic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Yuhui Chai; Jingwei Sheng; Peter A Bandettini; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Resting state BOLD functional connectivity at 3T: spin echo versus gradient echo EPI.

Authors:  Piero Chiacchiaretta; Antonio Ferretti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The role of mid-insula in the relationship between cardiac interoceptive attention and anxiety: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yafei Tan; Dongtao Wei; Meng Zhang; Junyi Yang; Valentina Jelinčić; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vessel architecture imaging using multiband gradient-echo/spin-echo EPI.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; Seong Dae Yun; Simon M F Triphan; Volker J Sturm; Lukas R Buschle; Artur Hahn; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; N Jon Shah; Christian H Ziener; Felix T Kurz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Osteopathy modulates brain-heart interaction in chronic pain patients: an ASL study.

Authors:  Francesco Cerritelli; Piero Chiacchiaretta; Francesco Gambi; Raoul Saggini; Mauro Gianni Perrucci; Antonio Ferretti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  MRI-based clinical-radiomics model predicts tumor response before treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Delli Pizzi; Antonio Maria Chiarelli; Piero Chiacchiaretta; Martina d'Annibale; Pierpaolo Croce; Consuelo Rosa; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Stefano Trebeschi; Doenja Marina Johanna Lambregts; Daniele Caposiena; Francesco Lorenzo Serafini; Raffaella Basilico; Giulio Cocco; Pierluigi Di Sebastiano; Sebastiano Cinalli; Antonio Ferretti; Richard Geoffrey Wise; Domenico Genovesi; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Massimo Caulo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.