Literature DB >> 23707313

Right, but not left, bundle branch block is associated with large anteroseptal scar.

David G Strauss1, Zak Loring, Ronald H Selvester, Gary Gerstenblith, Gordon Tomaselli, Robert G Weiss, Galen S Wagner, Katherine C Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger scar size than left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients do.
BACKGROUND: A proximal septal perforating branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not the left posterior fascicle. Thus, proximal LAD occlusions should cause RBBB, not LBBB.
METHODS: We performed electrocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging for scar quantification in 233 patients with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35% who were receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD cohort). Scar size and location were compared among patients with RBBB, LBBB, nonspecific LV conduction delay, and QRS <120 ms. A second cohort of 20 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation was studied to determine whether controlled infarction in a proximal LAD septal perforator caused RBBB or LBBB.
RESULTS: In the ICD cohort, LV ejection fraction was similar between RBBB and LBBB patients (24.9% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.98); however, RBBB patients had significantly larger scar size (24.0% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.0001). Patients with nonspecific LV conduction delay or QRS <120 ms had intermediate scar size (12.9% and 14.4%, respectively). Those with RBBB (compared with LBBB) were more likely to have ischemic heart disease (79% vs. 29%; p < 0.0001). In the alcohol septal ablation cohort, 15 of 20 patients (75%) developed RBBB, but no patients developed LBBB.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LV ejection fraction ≤35%, RBBB is associated with significantly larger scar size than LBBB is, and occlusion of a proximal LAD septal perforator causes RBBB. In contrast, LBBB is most commonly caused by nonischemic pathologies.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMR-LGE; CRT; ECG; ICD; LAD; LBBB; LV; LVCD; MI; RBBB; RCA; cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement; cardiac resynchronization therapy; electrocardiography/electrocardiogram(s); implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; ischemic heart disease; left anterior descending coronary artery; left bundle branch block; left ventricle/ventricular; left ventricular conduction delay; myocardial infarction; myocardial infarction(s); nonischemic cardiomyopathy; right bundle branch block; right coronary artery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707313      PMCID: PMC3785987          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  31 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  An epidemic of dyssynchrony: but what does it mean?

Authors:  David A Kass
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Robert M Judd; Udo Sechtem; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Clerio F Azevedo; Alan Cheng; Sandeep N Gupta; David A Bluemke; Thomas K Foo; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Late gadolinium enhancement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance heralds an adverse prognosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Katherine C Wu; Robert G Weiss; David R Thiemann; Kakuya Kitagawa; André Schmidt; Darshan Dalal; Shenghan Lai; David A Bluemke; Gary Gerstenblith; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial.

Authors:  James B Young; William T Abraham; Andrew L Smith; Angel R Leon; Randy Lieberman; Bruce Wilkoff; Robert C Canby; John S Schroeder; L Bing Liem; Shelley Hall; Kevin Wheelan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators.

Authors:  E B Sgarbossa; S L Pinski; A Barbagelata; D A Underwood; K B Gates; E J Topol; R M Califf; G S Wagner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Does cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit patients with right bundle branch block: left ventricular free wall pacing: seldom right for right bundle branch block.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06

2.  Right bundle branch block and anterior wall ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Monica Trofin; Carsten W Israel; S Serge Barold
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  ICD and CRT use in ischemic heart disease in women.

Authors:  Nishaki Kiran Mehta; William T Abraham; Melanie Maytin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Cardiac MRI assessment of right ventricular function: impact of right bundle branch block on the evaluation of cardiac performance parameters.

Authors:  Robert Marterer; Zeng Hongchun; Sebastian Tschauner; Martin Koestenberger; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Significance of an isolated new right bundle branch block in a patient with chest pain.

Authors:  Geraldine Gilliot; Pierre Monney; Olivier Muller; Olivier Hugli
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-08

6.  Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Idiopathic Left Bundle-Branch Block in Young Adults.

Authors:  Pietro Delise; Luigi Rivetti; Giuseppe Poletti; Monica Centa; Giuseppe Allocca; Nadir Sitta; Arianna Cati; Giovanni Turiano; Emanuela Lanari; Paolo Zeppilli; Luigi Sciarra
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Scar burden assessed by Selvester QRS score predicts prognosis, not CRT clinical benefit in preventing heart failure event and death: A MADIT-CRT sub-study.

Authors:  Björn Wieslander; Zak Loring; Wojciech Zareba; Scott McNitt; Galen S Wagner; James P Daubert; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.438

8.  Genetic variation at the human connexin 43 locus but not at the connexin 40 locus is associated with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Per Ladenvall; Björn Andersson; Mikael Dellborg; Per-Olof Hansson; Henry Eriksson; Dag Thelle; Peter Eriksson
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-04-10

9.  Correlation between septal midwall late gadolinium enhancement on CMR and conduction delay on ECG in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Marthe A J Becker; Cornelis P Allaart; Alwin Zweerink; Jan H Cornel; Peter M van de Ven; Albert C van Rossum; Tjeerd Germans
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-01-25

Review 10.  Devices in heart failure; diagnosis, detection and disease modification.

Authors:  John Gierula; Mark T Kearney; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.