Literature DB >> 23707147

Biological and clinical characteristics of individuals at risk for spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6 in the longitudinal RISCA study: analysis of baseline data.

Heike Jacobi1, Kathrin Reetz, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, Peter Bauer, Caterina Mariotti, Lorenzo Nanetti, Maria Rakowicz, Anna Sulek, Alexandra Durr, Perrine Charles, Alessandro Filla, Antonella Antenora, Ludger Schöls, Julia Schicks, Jon Infante, Jun-Suk Kang, Dagmar Timmann, Roberto Di Fabio, Marcella Masciullo, Laszlo Baliko, Bela Melegh, Sylvia Boesch, Katrin Bürk, Annkathrin Peltz, Jörg B Schulz, Isabelle Dufaure-Garé, Thomas Klockgether.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are autosomal, dominantly inherited, fully penetrant neurodegenerative diseases. Our aim was to study the preclinical stage of the most common SCAs: SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6.
METHODS: Between Sept 13, 2008, and Dec 1, 2011, offspring or siblings of patients with SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, or SCA6 were enrolled into a prospective, longitudinal observational study at 14 European centres. To be eligible for inclusion in our study, individuals had to have no ataxia and be aged 18-50 years if directly related to individuals with SCA1, SCA2, or SCA3, or 35-70 years if directly related to individuals with SCA6. We did anonymous genetic testing to identify mutation carriers. We assessed participants with clinical scales, questionnaires, and performance-based coordination tests. In eight of the 14 centres, participants underwent MRI. We analysed relations between outcome variables and time from onset (defined as the difference between present age and estimated age at ataxia onset). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01037777.
FINDINGS: 276 participants met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate, of whom 12 (4%) were excluded from final analysis because DNA samples were missing or genotyping failed. Estimated time from onset was -9 years (IQR -13 to -6) in 50 carriers of the SCA1 mutation, -12 years (-15 to -9) in 31 SCA2 mutation carriers, -8 years (-11 to -6) in 26 SCA3 mutation carriers, and -18 years (-22 to -16) in 16 SCA6 mutation carriers. Compared with non-carriers of each mutation, SCA1 mutation carriers had higher median scores on the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA; 0·5 [IQR 0-1·0] vs 0 [0-0]; p=0·0052), as did SCA2 mutation carriers (0·5 [0-2·0] vs 0 [0-0·5]; p=0·0037). SCA2 mutation carriers had lower SCA functional index scores than did non-carriers (-0·43 [-0·91 to -0·07] vs 0·09 [-0·30 to 0·56]; p=0·0007). SCA2 mutation carriers had worse composite cerebellar functional scores than did their non-carrier counterparts (0·915 [0·861-0·959] vs 0·849 [0·764-0·886]; p=0·0039). All other differences between carriers and non-carriers were non-significant. In SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers, SARA scores were increased in participants who were closer to the estimated age at onset (SCA1: r=0·36, p=0·0112; SCA2: r=0·50, p=0·0038). 83 individuals (30%) underwent MRI. Voxel-based morphometry showed grey-matter loss in the brainstem and cerebellum in SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers, and normalised brainstem volume was lower in SCA2 mutation carriers (median 0·015, range 0·012-0·016) than in non-carriers (0·019, 0·017-0·021; p=0·0107).
INTERPRETATION: Preclinical SCA1 and SCA2 mutation carriers seem to have mild coordination deficits and abnormalities in the brain that are more common in carriers who are closer to the estimated onset of ataxia. Individuals in this early disease stage could be targeted in future preventive trials. FUNDING: ERA-Net E-Rare and Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707147     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70104-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  65 in total

1.  Oculomotor deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: Potential biomarkers of preclinical detection and disease progression.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Ding-Bang Chen; Li Feng; Xiang-Xue Zhou; Ji-Wei Zhang; Hua-Jing You; Xiu-Ling Liang; Zhong Pei; Xun-Hua Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  Hereditary Ataxias in Cuba: A Nationwide Epidemiological and Clinical Study in 1001 Patients.

Authors:  Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Jacqueline Medrano-Montero; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Nalia Canales-Ochoa; Jandy Campins Alí; Frank J Carrillo Rodes; Tania Rodríguez Graña; María O Hernández Oliver; Raul Aguilera Rodríguez; Yennis Domínguez Barrios; Reydenis Torres Vega; Lissi Flores Angulo; Noharis Y Cordero Navarro; Aldo A Sigler Villanueva; Osiel Gámez Rodríguez; Ilya Sagaró Zambrano; Nayime Y Navas Napóles; Javier García Zacarías; Orlando R Serrano Barrera; María B Ramírez Bautista; Annelié Estupiñán Rodríguez; Leonardo A Guerra Rondón; Yaimeé Vázquez-Mojena; Yanetza González-Zaldivar; Luis E Almaguer Mederos; Alejandro Leyva-Mérida
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Consensus Paper: Neurophysiological Assessments of Ataxias in Daily Practice.

Authors:  W Ilg; M Branscheidt; A Butala; P Celnik; L de Paola; F B Horak; L Schöls; H A G Teive; A P Vogel; D S Zee; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Consensus paper: radiological biomarkers of cerebellar diseases.

Authors:  Leonardo Baldarçara; Stuart Currie; M Hadjivassiliou; Nigel Hoggard; Allison Jack; Andrea P Jackowski; Mario Mascalchi; Cecilia Parazzini; Kathrin Reetz; Andrea Righini; Jörg B Schulz; Alessandra Vella; Sara Jane Webb; Christophe Habas
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Spinocerebellar ataxias: prospects and challenges for therapy development.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ashizawa; Gülin Öz; Henry L Paulson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 42.937

6.  Cerebellar contribution to the cognitive alterations in SCA1: evidence from mouse models.

Authors:  Melissa Asher; Juao-Guilherme Rosa; Orion Rainwater; Lisa Duvick; Michael Bennyworth; Ruo-Yah Lai; Sheng-Han Kuo; Marija Cvetanovic
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Dilemma of multiple system atrophy and spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Ming Li; Qianqian Ma; Xing Zhao; Can Wang; Huijie Wu; Jinyao Li; Wei Yang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Neurochemical abnormalities in premanifest and early spinocerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  James M Joers; Dinesh K Deelchand; Tianmeng Lyu; Uzay E Emir; Diane Hutter; Christopher M Gomez; Khalaf O Bushara; Lynn E Eberly; Gülin Öz
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Evolution of the vestibular function during head impulses in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6.

Authors:  Sun-Uk Lee; Ji-Soo Kim; Hyo-Jung Kim; Jeong-Yoon Choi; Ji-Yun Park; Jong-Min Kim; Xu Yang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Recessive spinocerebellar ataxia with paroxysmal cough attacks: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Rigoberto González-Piña; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Raul Aguilera-Rodríguez; Lourdes Galicia-Polo; Yaimeé Vázquez-Mojena; Ana M Cortés-Rubio; Marla R Trujillo-Bracamontes; Cesar M Cerecedo-Zapata; Oscar Hernández-Hernández; Bulmaro Cisneros; Jonathan J Magaña
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.