Literature DB >> 23706588

Gleason 6 prostate tumors diagnosed in the PSA era do not demonstrate the capacity for metastatic spread at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Nicholas M Donin1, Juliana Laze, Ming Zhou, Qinghu Ren, Herbert Lepor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the probability that Gleason 6 tumors diagnosed in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) develop metastasis.
METHODS: Between October 2000 and June 2012, 1781 men underwent open RP by a single surgeon. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as a serum PSA value ≥0.2 ng/mL, or 2 progressively rising PSA values >0.14 ng/mL. Significant BCR (sBCR) was defined as a BCR with a PSA doubling time (PSADT) <36 months. Insignificant BCR (iBCR) was defined as BCR with a PSADT ≥36 months.
RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-seven of men (48.1%) undergoing open RP had a pathologic diagnosis of Gleason 6. Twenty-three of 857 of these men (2.7%) developed BCR, 7 were designated as iBCR (mean PSADT 81 months, range 36 to 100), 16 were sBCR (mean PSADT 8 months, range 1.5-20 months). There was a 10-fold difference in PSADT between the sBCR and iBCR groups (P <.001). All men with sBCR underwent salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and all demonstrated a subsequent PSA decline to ≤0.1 ng/mL, suggesting all men had local recurrence. Two men (0.23%) developed a BCR after salvage radiation therapy, both of whom were found to have Gleason 7 disease after pathologic re-review.
CONCLUSION: In our large cohort of men with pathological Gleason 6 disease undergoing open RP, sBCR were attributable exclusively to local disease recurrences. Our findings support the conclusion that Gleason 6 disease exhibits a very low capacity for metastatic spread.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23706588     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: Is prostatectomy for Gleason score 6 a treatment failure?

Authors:  Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Michael J Triolo; Jonathan Melamed; Henry Rusinek; Samir S Taneja; Fang-Ming Deng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Application of a hydrogel spacer for postoperative salvage radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael Pinkawa; Carolin Schubert; Nuria Escobar-Corral; Richard Holy; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between upgraded pathologic Gleason score 3 + 4 and non-upgraded 3 + 4 prostate cancer among patients who are candidates for active surveillance.

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Jong Jin Oh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Prostate cancer: A simplified prostate cancer grading system.

Authors:  Eric H Kim; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Focal laser ablation for localized prostate cancer: principles, clinical trials, and our initial experience.

Authors:  Ted Lee; Neil Mendhiratta; Dan Sperling; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

Review 7.  Molecular Pathology of High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Levent Trabzonlu; Ibrahim Kulac; Qizhi Zheng; Jessica L Hicks; Michael C Haffner; William G Nelson; Karen S Sfanos; Onur Ertunc; Tamara L Lotan; Christopher M Heaphy; Alan K Meeker; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Size-adjusted Quantitative Gleason Score as a Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fang-Ming Deng; Nicholas M Donin; Ruth Pe Benito; Jonathan Melamed; Julien Le Nobin; Ming Zhou; Sisi Ma; Jinhua Wang; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Indications for and transitioning to secondary treatment while on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allison S Glass; Marc A Dall'Era
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.