Literature DB >> 23706394

Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Azra A Ashraf1, Salih Colakoglu, John T Nguyen, Alexandra J Anastasopulos, Ahmed M S Ibrahim, Janet H Yueh, Samuel J Lin, Adam M Tobias, Bernard T Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patient-physician relationship has evolved from the paternalistic, physician-dominant model to the shared-decision-making and informed-consumerist model. The level of patient involvement in this decision-making process can potentially influence patient satisfaction and quality of life. In this study, patient-physician decision models are evaluated in patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
METHODS: All women who underwent breast reconstruction at an academic hospital from 1999-2007 were identified. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were mailed questionnaires at a minimum of 1 y postoperatively with questions about decision making, satisfaction, and quality of life.
RESULTS: There were 707 women eligible for our study and 465 completed surveys (68% response rate). Patients were divided into one of three groups: paternalistic (n = 18), informed-consumerist (n = 307), shared (n = 140). There were differences in overall general satisfaction (P = 0.034), specifically comparing the informed group to the paternalistic group (66.7% versus 38.9%, P = 0.020) and the shared to the paternalistic group (69.3% versus 38.9%, P = 0.016). There were no differences in aesthetic satisfaction. There were differences found in the SF-12 physical component summary score across all groups (P = 0.033), and a difference was found between the informed and paternalistic groups (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the mental component score (P = 0.42).
CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing breast reconstruction predominantly used the informed model of decision making. Patients who adopted a more active role, whether using an informed or shared approach, had higher general patient satisfaction and physical component summary scores compared with patients whose decision making was paternalistic.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Mastectomy; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23706394     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  21 in total

1.  Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Cindy B Matsen; Sarah Lyons; Melody S Goodman; Barbara B Biesecker; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 2.  Humanization of Care: Key Elements Identified by Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Providers. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Isolde M Busch; Francesca Moretti; Giulia Travaini; Albert W Wu; Michela Rimondini
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.

Authors:  Julia A Cook; Sarah E Sasor; Sunil S Tholpady; Arash Momeni; Michael W Chu
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-20

4.  Incongruence in treatment decision making is associated with lower health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anna T Gavin; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Use of a Shared Mental Model by a Team Composed of Oncology, Palliative Care, and Supportive Care Clinicians to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in a Patient With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F D'Ambruoso; Anne Coscarelli; Sara Hurvitz; Neil Wenger; David Coniglio; Dusty Donaldson; Christopher Pietras; Anne M Walling
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Patient education for carpal tunnel syndrome: analysis of readability.

Authors:  Kyle R Eberlin; Christina R Vargas; Danielle J Chuang; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-09

8.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Web-Based Information on Breast Cancer Patients' Knowledge of Surgical Treatment Options.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tucholka; Dou-Yan Yang; Jordan G Bruce; Nicole M Steffens; Jessica R Schumacher; Caprice C Greenberg; Lee G Wilke; Jennifer Steiman; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Empowered Choices: African-American Women's Breast Reconstruction Decisions.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Isabel Martinez Leal; Vijay Nitturi; Chisom N Iwundu; Valentina Maza; Stacey Reyes; Chiara Acquati; Lorraine R Reitzel
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2021-03-01

10.  Participatory decision-making for cancer care in a high-risk sample of low income Mexican-American breast cancer survivors: The role of acculturation.

Authors:  Maribel Cervantes-Ortega; Senxi Du; Kelly A Biegler; Sadeeka Al-Majid; Katelyn C Davis; Yunan Chen; Alfred Kobsa; Dana B Mukamel; Dara H Sorkin
Journal:  Int J Healthc       Date:  2020-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.