Literature DB >> 23704837

Analysis of mitral valve replacement outcomes is enhanced by meaningful clinical use of electronic health records.

John C Chen1, Thomas Pfeffer, Shelley Johnstone, Yuexin Chen, Mary-Lou Kiley, Richard Richter, Hon Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgical mortality has improved during the last decade despite the aging of the population. An integrated US health plan developed a heart valve registry to track outcomes and complications of heart valve operations. This database was used for longitudinal evaluation of mitral valve (MV) outcomes from 1999 to 2008 at four affiliated hospitals.
METHODS: We identified 3130 patients in the Apollo database who underwent 3180 initial MV procedures. Internal administrative and Social Security Administration databases were merged to determine survival rates. Electronic health records were searched to ascertain demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Cox regression was used to evaluate mean survival and identify risk factors.
RESULTS: The procedures included 1160 mechanical valve replacements, 1159 tissue valve replacements, and 861 annuloplasties. The mean age of patients undergoing these procedures was 58 ± 11 years, 69 ± 12 years, and 62 ± 12 years, respectively. Mean survival was 8.9 ± 0.1 years for mechanical valve replacement, 7.0 ± 0.1 years for tissue valve replacement, and 7.7 ± 0.1 years for annuloplasty. Early in the study, there was a preference for implanting mechanical MVs. Beginning in 2003, more patients received tissue valve replacements rather than mechanical valves. Over time, there was an increasing trend of annuloplasty. Cox regression analysis identified the following risk factors for increased ten-year mortality: tissue valve implantation; advanced age; female sex; nonelective, nonisolated procedure; diabetes; postoperative use of banked blood products; previous cardiovascular intervention; dialysis; and longer perfusion time. Hospital location, reoperation, preoperative anticoagulation, and cardiogenic shock were not statistically significant risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: When controlling for other risk factors, we observed a lower long-term survival rate for tissue valve replacement compared with mechanical valve replacement. Integrating electronic health records with existing electronic databases provided near-real-time analysis of longitudinal cardiac surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23704837      PMCID: PMC3662282          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/12-113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  13 in total

1.  Reoperations on heart valve prostheses: an analysis of operative risks and late results.

Authors:  S Pansini; G Ottino; P G Forsennati; G Serpieri; G Zattera; R Casabona; M di Summa; M Villani; G A Poletti; M Morea
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Negotiating the EHR vendor contract.

Authors:  Jenny Jackson; Steven J Fox; Vadim Schick
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03

3.  Meaningful use of electronic health records.

Authors:  Vinita M Ollapally
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05

4.  Results of bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement performed with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Cary W Akins; Alan D Hilgenberg; Gus J Vlahakes; Thomas E MacGillivray; David F Torchiana; Joren C Madsen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.

Authors:  S S Khan; A Trento; M DeRobertis; R M Kass; M Sandhu; L S Czer; C Blanche; S Raissi; G P Fontana; W Cheng; A Chaux; J M Matloff
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Analysis of risk factors involved in reoperation for mitral and tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  D S Mary; I T Bartek; M el-Elmufti; B C Pakrashi; S M Fayoumi; M I Ionescu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparison of outcome after valve replacement with a bioprosthesis versus a mechanical prosthesis: initial 5 year results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  K E Hammermeister; W G Henderson; C M Burchfiel; G K Sethi; J Souchek; C Oprian; A B Cantor; E Folland; S Khuri; S Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Fern FitzHenry; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Kristen L Kotter; Kimberly Crimin; Robert S Dittus; Amy K Rosen; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update.

Authors:  Shahbudin H Rahimtoola
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Mitral valve repair for degenerative disease: a 20-year experience.

Authors:  Mani A Daneshmand; Carmelo A Milano; J Scott Rankin; Emily F Honeycutt; Madhav Swaminathan; Linda K Shaw; Peter K Smith; Donald D Glower
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.