Literature DB >> 23704173

Genome Sequence of Burkholderia pseudomallei NCTC 13392.

Jason W Sahl1, Joshua K Stone, H Carl Gelhaus, Richard L Warren, Caroline J Cruttwell, Simon G Funnell, Paul Keim, Apichai Tuanyok.   

Abstract

Here, we describe the draft genome sequence of Burkholderia pseudomallei NCTC 13392. This isolate has been distributed as K96243, but distinct genomic differences have been identified. The genomic sequence of this isolate will provide the genomic context for previously conducted functional studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23704173      PMCID: PMC3662813          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00183-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Burkholderia pseudomallei is the causative agent of the potentially fatal disease melioidosis (1). Melioidosis is endemic to Southeast Asia and northern Australia, where B. pseudomallei is found in wet soil (2). B. pseudomallei is a phylogenetically diverse pathogen, as revealed by whole-genome sequence analysis (3). A recent study demonstrated that B. pseudomallei NCTC 13392 (cited at the time of the study by the United Kingdom National Collection of Type Cultures as strain K96243), provided by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) in the United Kingdom, was shown to cause lethal inhalational melioidosis in a marmoset model (4). We sequenced the isolate used in that study and compared its genome to that of the published version of K96243 (5). Based on a comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phylogenetic position, we determined that NCTC 13392 is substantially different from K96243. Subsequent investigation identified that although NCTC 13392 was received from the same laboratory in Thailand at the same time as K96243, it was unexpectedly a different strain; the authors of the marmoset study have since published an erratum to describe this discrepancy (6). Here, we describe the genome to provide the context for the functional results obtained from the marmoset model study. Genomic DNA was isolated with Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Inc.). The genomic sequence was generated on the Illumina GA IIx platform, using both 300-bp and 1,000-bp insert sizes. A comparative assembly was performed with AMOScmp (7) with the 1,000-bp insert sequences, using K96243 as the reference sequence, based on preliminary phylogenetic analyses. The AMOS assembly was then processed with the PAGIT pipeline (8) to improve the contiguity of the assembly. A de novo assembly was also performed with Velvet (9) in conjunction with the VelvetOptimiser (http://bioinformatics.net.au/software.velvetoptimiser.shtml). The reference-based assembly and the de novo assembly were then aligned with Mugsy (10). Regions unique to the de novo assembly were parsed from the alignment and concatenated to the comparative assembly. Errors were corrected in the final assembly with iCORN (11). The raw reads were also mapped to the final assembly with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (12), and SNPs were called with the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) (13). The final assembly consisted of 48 contigs, with an assembled genome length of 7.16 Mbp and an N50 of ~418 Kbp. The average coverage across the genome was 140× (1,000-bp library). An in silico multilocus sequence type (MLST) analysis classified NCTC 13392 as sequence type 23 (ST23), with a single nucleotide difference to K96243 in the gltB gene. There are 7 ST23 isolates in the MLST database (http://bpseudomallei.mlst.net/), all of which were isolated in Thailand. An SNP analysis of raw reads against the finished genome of K96243 identified 13,256 SNPs, including 3,050 nonsynonymous SNPs. In addition, ~121 Kbp of sequence data was identified in NCTC 13392 that was absent from K96243; genes from these regions were associated with bacteriophages in previously sequenced B. pseudomallei genomes. This analysis demonstrates that the genome of NCTC 13392 is distinct from that of K96243 and that genomic elements from NCTC 13392 might be used to correlate with the results from animal model studies.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This Whole-Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AOUG00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, accession no. AOUG01000000.
  12 in total

1.  Comparative genome assembly.

Authors:  Mihai Pop; Adam Phillippy; Arthur L Delcher; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Matthew T G Holden; Richard W Titball; Sharon J Peacock; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Timothy Atkins; Lisa C Crossman; Tyrone Pitt; Carol Churcher; Karen Mungall; Stephen D Bentley; Mohammed Sebaihia; Nicholas R Thomson; Nathalie Bason; Ifor R Beacham; Karen Brooks; Katherine A Brown; Nat F Brown; Greg L Challis; Inna Cherevach; Tracy Chillingworth; Ann Cronin; Ben Crossett; Paul Davis; David DeShazer; Theresa Feltwell; Audrey Fraser; Zahra Hance; Heidi Hauser; Simon Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Karen E Keith; Mark Maddison; Sharon Moule; Claire Price; Michael A Quail; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Kim Rutherford; Mandy Sanders; Mark Simmonds; Sirirurg Songsivilai; Kim Stevens; Sarinna Tumapa; Monkgol Vesaratchavest; Sally Whitehead; Corin Yeats; Bart G Barrell; Petra C F Oyston; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Melioidosis as an emerging global problem.

Authors:  D A Dance
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  A post-assembly genome-improvement toolkit (PAGIT) to obtain annotated genomes from contigs.

Authors:  Martin T Swain; Isheng J Tsai; Samual A Assefa; Chris Newbold; Matthew Berriman; Thomas D Otto
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Iterative Correction of Reference Nucleotides (iCORN) using second generation sequencing technology.

Authors:  Thomas D Otto; Mandy Sanders; Matthew Berriman; Chris Newbold
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Melioidosis.

Authors:  N J White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Eric Banks; Ryan Poplin; Kiran V Garimella; Jared R Maguire; Christopher Hartl; Anthony A Philippakis; Guillermo del Angel; Manuel A Rivas; Matt Hanna; Aaron McKenna; Tim J Fennell; Andrew M Kernytsky; Andrey Y Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Stacey B Gabriel; David Altshuler; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes.

Authors:  Samuel V Angiuoli; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Phylogeographic reconstruction of a bacterial species with high levels of lateral gene transfer.

Authors:  Talima Pearson; Philip Giffard; Stephen Beckstrom-Sternberg; Raymond Auerbach; Heidie Hornstra; Apichai Tuanyok; Erin P Price; Mindy B Glass; Benjamin Leadem; James S Beckstrom-Sternberg; Gerard J Allan; Jeffrey T Foster; David M Wagner; Richard T Okinaka; Siew Hoon Sim; Ofori Pearson; Zaining Wu; Jean Chang; Rajinder Kaul; Alex R Hoffmaster; Thomas S Brettin; Richard A Robison; Mark Mayo; Jay E Gee; Patrick Tan; Bart J Currie; Paul Keim
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparative experimental subcutaneous glanders and melioidosis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle Nelson; Francisco J Salguero; Rachel E Dean; Sarah A Ngugi; Sophie J Smither; Timothy P Atkins; Mark S Lever
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Deeplasmid: deep learning accurately separates plasmids from bacterial chromosomes.

Authors:  William B Andreopoulos; Alexander M Geller; Miriam Lucke; Jan Balewski; Alicia Clum; Natalia N Ivanova; Asaf Levy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Genomic characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates selected for medical countermeasures testing: comparative genomics associated with differential virulence.

Authors:  Jason W Sahl; Christopher J Allender; Rebecca E Colman; Katy J Califf; James M Schupp; Bart J Currie; Kristopher E Van Zandt; H Carl Gelhaus; Paul Keim; Apichai Tuanyok
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  An Evolutionary Arms Race Between Burkholderia pseudomallei and Host Immune System: What Do We Know?

Authors:  Chalita Chomkatekaew; Phumrapee Boonklang; Apiwat Sangphukieo; Claire Chewapreecha
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Co-evolutionary Signals Identify Burkholderia pseudomallei Survival Strategies in a Hostile Environment.

Authors:  Claire Chewapreecha; Johan Pensar; Supaksorn Chattagul; Maiju Pesonen; Apiwat Sangphukieo; Phumrapee Boonklang; Chotima Potisap; Sirikamon Koosakulnirand; Edward J Feil; Susanna Dunachie; Narisara Chantratita; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Sharon J Peacock; Nick P J Day; Julian Parkhill; Nicholas R Thomson; Rasana W Sermswan; Jukka Corander
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.