CONTEXT: Calcium and vitamin D are recommended for bone health, but there are concerns about adverse risks. Some clinical studies suggest that calcium intake may be cardioprotective, whereas others report increased risk associated with calcium supplements. Both low and high serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D have been associated with increased mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between total calcium and vitamin D intake and mortality and heterogeneity by source of intake. DESIGN: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study cohort is a population-based longitudinal cohort with a 10-year follow-up (1995-2007). SETTING: This study included randomly selected community-dwelling men and women. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9033 participants with nonmissing calcium and vitamin D intake data and follow-up were studied. EXPOSURE: Total calcium intake (dairy, nondairy food, and supplements) and total vitamin D intake (milk, yogurt, and supplements) were recorded. OUTCOME: The outcome variable was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: There were 1160 deaths during the 10-year period. For women only, we found a possible benefit of higher total calcium intake, with a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.01) per 500-mg increase in daily calcium intake and no evidence of heterogeneity by source; use of calcium supplements was also associated with reduced mortality, with hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.92) for users vs nonusers with statistically significant reductions remaining among those with doses up to 1000 mg/d. These associations were not modified by levels of concurrent vitamin D intake. No definitive associations were found among men. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplements, up to 1000 mg/d, and increased dietary intake of calcium may be associated with reduced risk of mortality in women. We found no evidence of mortality benefit or harm associated with vitamin D intake.
CONTEXT: Calcium and vitamin D are recommended for bone health, but there are concerns about adverse risks. Some clinical studies suggest that calcium intake may be cardioprotective, whereas others report increased risk associated with calcium supplements. Both low and high serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D have been associated with increased mortality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between total calcium and vitamin D intake and mortality and heterogeneity by source of intake. DESIGN: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study cohort is a population-based longitudinal cohort with a 10-year follow-up (1995-2007). SETTING: This study included randomly selected community-dwelling men and women. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9033 participants with nonmissing calcium and vitamin D intake data and follow-up were studied. EXPOSURE: Total calcium intake (dairy, nondairy food, and supplements) and total vitamin D intake (milk, yogurt, and supplements) were recorded. OUTCOME: The outcome variable was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: There were 1160 deaths during the 10-year period. For women only, we found a possible benefit of higher total calcium intake, with a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.01) per 500-mg increase in daily calcium intake and no evidence of heterogeneity by source; use of calcium supplements was also associated with reduced mortality, with hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.92) for users vs nonusers with statistically significant reductions remaining among those with doses up to 1000 mg/d. These associations were not modified by levels of concurrent vitamin D intake. No definitive associations were found among men. CONCLUSIONS:Calcium supplements, up to 1000 mg/d, and increased dietary intake of calcium may be associated with reduced risk of mortality in women. We found no evidence of mortality benefit or harm associated with vitamin D intake.
Authors: Claudie Berger; Linda S Greene-Finestone; Lisa Langsetmo; Nancy Kreiger; Lawrence Joseph; Christopher S Kovacs; J Brent Richards; Nick Hidiroglou; Kurtis Sarafin; K Shawn Davison; Jonathan D Adachi; Jacques Brown; David A Hanley; Jerilynn C Prior; David Goltzman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: P N Sambrook; J S Chen; L M March; I D Cameron; R G Cumming; S R Lord; J Schwarz; M J Seibel Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kati Pentti; Marjo T Tuppurainen; Risto Honkanen; Lorenzo Sandini; Heikki Kröger; Esko Alhava; Seppo Saarikoski Journal: Maturitas Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Andrea Z LaCroix; Jane Kotchen; Garnet Anderson; Robert Brzyski; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings; Margery Gass; Karen C Johnson; Marcia Ko; Joseph Larson; JoAnn E Manson; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Mark J Bolland; P Alan Barber; Robert N Doughty; Barbara Mason; Anne Horne; Ruth Ames; Gregory D Gamble; Andrew Grey; Ian R Reid Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-01-15
Authors: A Catharine Ross; JoAnn E Manson; Steven A Abrams; John F Aloia; Patsy M Brannon; Steven K Clinton; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; J Christopher Gallagher; Richard L Gallo; Glenville Jones; Christopher S Kovacs; Susan T Mayne; Clifford J Rosen; Sue A Shapses Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Laura M Raffield; Subhashish Agarwal; Amanda J Cox; Fang-Chi Hsu; J Jeffrey Carr; Barry I Freedman; Jianzhao Xu; Donald W Bowden; Mara Z Vitolins Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 7.045