Janet K Specht1. 1. University of Iowa, John A. Hartford Center for Geriatric Nursing Excellence, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. janet-specht@uiowa.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the need for use of evidence based practice (EBP) in LTC, the current use of evidence in long term care facilities and what we know about adoption of the use of EBP in LTC. METHODS: Literature review and reporting of findings from the M-TRAIN study that was a quasi-experimental design to test the effectiveness of an intervention to increase the use of EBPs for urinary incontinence and pain in 48 LTC facilities. RESULTS: Barriers to adopting EBPs include lack of available time, lack of access to current research literature, limited critical appraisal skills, excessive literature to review, non-receptive organizational culture, limited resources, and limited decision-making authority of staff to implement change. Strategies to promote adoption of EBP include the commitment of management; the culture of the home; leadership; staff knowledge, time, and reward; and facility size, complexity, the extent that members are involved outside the facility, NH chain membership, and high level of private pay residents. Findings from the M-TRAIN add, stability of nurse leader and congruency between the leaders perception of their leadership and the staff's perception of the leadership. CONCLUSION: There is clear evidence of the need and the benefits to residents of LTC and to the health care system yet adoption of EBP continues to be slow and sporadic. There is also evidence for the process of establishing best evidence and many resources to find the available EBPs. The urgent need now is finding ways to best get the EBPs implemented in LTC. There is growing evidence about best methods to do this but continued research is needed. Clearly, residents in LTC deserve the best care possible and EBPs represent an important vehicle by which to do this.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the need for use of evidence based practice (EBP) in LTC, the current use of evidence in long term care facilities and what we know about adoption of the use of EBP in LTC. METHODS: Literature review and reporting of findings from the M-TRAIN study that was a quasi-experimental design to test the effectiveness of an intervention to increase the use of EBPs for urinary incontinence and pain in 48 LTC facilities. RESULTS: Barriers to adopting EBPs include lack of available time, lack of access to current research literature, limited critical appraisal skills, excessive literature to review, non-receptive organizational culture, limited resources, and limited decision-making authority of staff to implement change. Strategies to promote adoption of EBP include the commitment of management; the culture of the home; leadership; staff knowledge, time, and reward; and facility size, complexity, the extent that members are involved outside the facility, NH chain membership, and high level of private pay residents. Findings from the M-TRAIN add, stability of nurse leader and congruency between the leaders perception of their leadership and the staff's perception of the leadership. CONCLUSION: There is clear evidence of the need and the benefits to residents of LTC and to the health care system yet adoption of EBP continues to be slow and sporadic. There is also evidence for the process of establishing best evidence and many resources to find the available EBPs. The urgent need now is finding ways to best get the EBPs implemented in LTC. There is growing evidence about best methods to do this but continued research is needed. Clearly, residents in LTC deserve the best care possible and EBPs represent an important vehicle by which to do this.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adoption; Empowerment; Evidence based practice; Long term care; Translation research
Authors: Jana Bartakova; Franziska Zúñiga; Raphaëlle-Ashley Guerbaai; Kornelia Basinska; Thekla Brunkert; Michael Simon; Kris Denhaerynck; Sabina De Geest; Nathalie I H Wellens; Christine Serdaly; Reto W Kressig; Andreas Zeller; Lori L Popejoy; Dunja Nicca; Mario Desmedt; Carlo De Pietro Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Marleen H Lovink; Frank Verbeek; Anke Persoon; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Marleen Smits; Miranda G H Laurant; Anneke J van Vught Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Amanda M Hall; Gerd M Flodgren; Helen L Richmond; Sheila Welsh; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Bradley M Furlong; Andrea Sherriff Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-08-03