Literature DB >> 23703416

Value-based interventional pain management: a review of medicare national and local coverage determination policies.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti1, Frank J E Falco, Ramsin M Benyamin, Standiford Helm, Vijay Singh, Joshua A Hirsch.   

Abstract

Major policies, regulations, and practice patterns related to interventional pain management are dependent on Medicare policies which include national coverage policies - national coverage determinations (NCDs), and local coverage policies - local coverage determinations (LCDs). The NCDs are Medicare coverage policies issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The process used by the CMS in deciding what is and what is not medically necessary is lengthy, involving a review of evidence-based literature on the subject, expert opinion, and public comments. In contrast, LCDs are rules and Medicare coverage that are issued by regional contractors and fiscal intermediaries when an NCD has not addressed the policy at issue. The evidence utilized in preparing LCDs includes the highest level of evidence which is based on published authoritative evidence derived from definitive randomized clinical trials or other definitive studies, and general acceptance by the medical community (standard of practice), as supported by sound medical evidence. In addition, the intervention must be safe and effective and appropriate including duration and frequency that is considered appropriate for the item or service in terms of whether it is furnished in accordance with accepted standards of medical practice for the diagnosis or treatment of the patient's condition or to improve the function. In addition, the safe and effective provision includes that service must be furnished in a setting appropriate to the patient's medical needs and condition, ordered and furnished by qualified personnel, the service must meet, but does not exceed, the patient's medical need, and be at least as beneficial as an existing and available medically appropriate alternative. The LCDs are prepared with literature review, state medical societies, and carrier advisory committees (CACs) of which interventional pain management is a member. The LCDs may be appealed by beneficiaries. The NCDs are prepared by the CMS following a request for a national coverage decision after an appropriate national coverage request along with a draft decision memorandum, and public comments. After the request, the staff review, external technology assessment, Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee (MedCAC) assessment, public comments, a draft decision memorandum may be posted which will be followed by a final decision and implementation instructions. This decision may be appealed to the department appeals board, but may be difficult to reverse. This manuscript describes NCDs and LCDs and the process of development, their development, issues related to the development, and finally their relation to interventional pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23703416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  The Independent Payment Advisory Board.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; W D Donovan; R M Barr; G N Nicola; D A Rosman; P W Schaefer; L Manchikanti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Do Epidural Injections Provide Short- and Long-term Relief for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Ramsin M Benyamin; Frank J E Falco; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Utilization of Facet Joint and Sacroiliac Joint Interventions in Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: Explosive Growth Continues!

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-10

4.  Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Frank Je Falco; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

5.  Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other?

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vijay Singh; Vidyasagar Pampati; Frank Je Falco; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2015-01-02

6.  Two-year follow-up results of fluoroscopic cervical epidural injections in chronic axial or discogenic neck pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Kimberly A Cash; Vidyasagar Pampati; Yogesh Malla
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.