| Literature DB >> 23703249 |
M Avgeris1, K Stravodimos, E G Fragoulis, A Scorilas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is characterised by great heterogeneity of the disease progression rate. Tumours range from insignificant and not life threatening to high risk for relapse ones. Consequently, a large number of patients undergo unnecessary treatment. miR-145 is a well-documented tumour suppressor and its expression, which is regulated by the p53 pathway, has been found to be decreased in the majority of human malignancies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of miR-145 for the prognostication of PCa.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23703249 PMCID: PMC3694240 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Correlation of miR-145 expression profile with PCa patients' Gleason score, Clinical stage, PSA, DRE and age
| | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 2 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (100.0) | 0.015 |
| 6 | 22 | 5 (22.7) | 17 (77.3) | |
| 7 (3+4) | 25 | 10 (40.0) | 15 (60.0) | |
| 7 (4+3) | 14 | 9 (64.3) | 5 (35.7) | |
| 8 | 7 | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| ⩽6 | 24 | 5 (20.8) | 19 (79.2) | 0.004 |
| 7 | 39 | 19 (48.7) | 20 (51.3) | |
| ⩾8 | 10 | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | |
| pT2a | 17 | 4 (23.5) | 13 (76.5) | 0.047 |
| pT2b | 18 | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | |
| pT2c | 10 | 5 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | |
| pT3a | 15 | 7 (46.7) | 8 (53.3) | |
| pT3b | 13 | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | |
| ⩽ pT2c | 45 | 15 (33.3) | 30 (66.7) | 0.030 |
| ⩾ pT3a | 28 | 17 (60.7) | 11 (39.3) | |
| <4.0 | 7 | 0 (0.0) | 7 (100.0) | <0.001 |
| 4.0–10.0 | 43 | 14 (32.6) | 29 (67.4) | |
| ⩾ 10.0 | 22 | 18 (81.8) | 4 (18.2) | |
| Unknown | 1 | | | |
| Negative | 27 | 9 (33.3) | 18 (66.7) | 0.145 |
| Positive | 44 | 23 (52.3) | 21 (47.7) | |
| Unknown | 2 | | | |
| <65 | 36 | 15 (41.7) | 21 (58.3) | 0.887 |
| 65–74 | 32 | 15 (46.9) | 17 (53.1) | |
| ⩾75 | 4 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
| Unknown | 1 | |||
Abbreviations: DRE=digital rectal examination; PCa=prostate cancer; RQ=relative quantification.
Cutoff =2.97 × 103 RQ units, equal to the 45th percentile of the PCa patients' cohort.
Calculated by χ2 test.
Calculated by Fisher's exact test.
Figure 1Expression analysis of miR-145 related to PCa patients' Gleason score (A) and clinical stage (B and C). The bold lanes represent the median value (50th percentile) for each patient cohort. P-value was calculated by ‘Kruskal–Wallis test' (A and B) and by ‘Mann–Whitney U-test' (C).
Figure 2Correlation of miR-145 levels with PCa patients' pre-treatment PSA serum levels (A), follow-up PSA serum levels (B) and tumour diameter ( rs: Spearman correlation coefficient. P-value was calculated by ‘Spearman correlation'.
Cox proportional regression analysis for the prediction of the PCa patients' DFS
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Negative | 2.533 | 1.249–5.137 | 0.010 | 1.264 | 0.489–3.273 | 0.629 |
| Gleason score | 2.244 | 1.407–3.578 | 0.001 | 1.660 | 0.944–2.921 | 0.078 |
| Clinical stage | 1.504 | 1.178–1.922 | 0.001 | 1.151 | 0.818–1.621 | 0.419 |
| PSA | 1.092 | 1.035–1.151 | 0.001 | 1.034 | 0.957–1.117 | 0.397 |
| Age | 0.996 | 0.944–1.051 | 0.877 | 0.983 | 0.930–1.039 | 0.548 |
| DRE | 2.285 | 1.104–4.727 | 0.026 | 1.535 | 0.679–3.469 | 0.303 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; DRE=digital rectal examination; HR=hazard ratio; PCa=prostate cancer.
CI of the estimated HR.
Test for trend.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the DFS of PCa patients ( P-value was calculated by ‘log-rank test'.
Cox proportional regression analysis for the prediction of the ‘low- and intermediate-recurrence risk' and the ‘intermediate-recurrence risk' PCa patients' DFS
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Negative | 3.211 | 1.071–9.622 | 0.037 | 4.467 | 1.268–15.736 | 0.020 |
| Gleason score | 1.067 | 0.423–2.691 | 0.890 | 0.926 | 0.306–2.801 | 0.891 |
| Clinical stage | 0.711 | 0.309–1.634 | 0.422 | 0.435 | 0.133–1.419 | 0.167 |
| PSA | 1.101 | 0.885–1.370 | 0.386 | 1.110 | 0.847–1.428 | 0.475 |
| Age | 1.024 | 0.944–1.110 | 0.569 | 1.021 | 0.929–1.123 | 0.666 |
| DRE | 1.166 | 0.404–3.364 | 0.777 | 2.820 | 0.643–12.368 | 0.169 |
| Positive | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Negative | 4.048 | 1.131–14.479 | 0.032 | 4.425 | 1.112–17.613 | 0.035 |
| Gleason score | 1.235 | 0.411–3.706 | 0.707 | 1.225 | 0.323–4.646 | 0.766 |
| Clinical stage | 0.707 | 0.265–1.884 | 0.488 | 0.392 | 0.081–1.900 | 0.245 |
| PSA | 1.143 | 0.898–1.454 | 0.278 | 1.131 | 0.861–1.485 | 0.376 |
| Age | 1.002 | 0.916–1.097 | 0.957 | 0.986 | 0.879–1.106 | 0.812 |
| DRE | 1.249 | 0.380–4.099 | 0.714 | 3.205 | 0.576–17.848 | 0.169 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; DRE=digital rectal examination; HR=hazard ratio; PCa=prostate cancer.
CI of the estimated HR.
Test for trend.