BACKGROUND: Health-care costs are growing, with little population-based data about people's priorities for end-of-life care, to guide service development and aid discussions. AIM: We examined variations in people's priorities for treatment, care and information across seven European countries. DESIGN: Telephone survey of a random sample of households; we asked respondents their priorities if 'faced with a serious illness, like cancer, with limited time to live' and used multivariable logistic regressions to identify associated factors. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Members of the general public aged ≥ 16 years residing in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. RESULTS: In total, 9344 individuals were interviewed. Most people chose 'improve quality of life for the time they had left', ranging from 57% (95% confidence interval: 55%-60%, Italy) to 81% (95% confidence interval: 79%-83%, Spain). Only 2% (95% confidence interval: 1%-3%, England) to 6% (95% confidence interval: 4%-7%, Flanders) said extending life was most important, and 15% (95% confidence interval: 13%-17%, Spain) to 40% (95% confidence interval: 37%-43%, Italy) said quality and extension were equally important. Prioritising quality of life was associated with higher education in all countries (odds ratio = 1.3 (Flanders) to 7.9 (Italy)), experience of caregiving or bereavement (England, Germany, Portugal), prioritising pain/symptom control over having a positive attitude and preferring death in a hospice/palliative care unit. Those prioritising extending life had the highest home death preference of all groups. Health status did not affect priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Across all countries, extending life was prioritised by a minority, regardless of health status. Treatment and care needs to be reoriented with patient education and palliative care becoming mainstream for serious conditions such as cancer.
BACKGROUND: Health-care costs are growing, with little population-based data about people's priorities for end-of-life care, to guide service development and aid discussions. AIM: We examined variations in people's priorities for treatment, care and information across seven European countries. DESIGN: Telephone survey of a random sample of households; we asked respondents their priorities if 'faced with a serious illness, like cancer, with limited time to live' and used multivariable logistic regressions to identify associated factors. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Members of the general public aged ≥ 16 years residing in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. RESULTS: In total, 9344 individuals were interviewed. Most people chose 'improve quality of life for the time they had left', ranging from 57% (95% confidence interval: 55%-60%, Italy) to 81% (95% confidence interval: 79%-83%, Spain). Only 2% (95% confidence interval: 1%-3%, England) to 6% (95% confidence interval: 4%-7%, Flanders) said extending life was most important, and 15% (95% confidence interval: 13%-17%, Spain) to 40% (95% confidence interval: 37%-43%, Italy) said quality and extension were equally important. Prioritising quality of life was associated with higher education in all countries (odds ratio = 1.3 (Flanders) to 7.9 (Italy)), experience of caregiving or bereavement (England, Germany, Portugal), prioritising pain/symptom control over having a positive attitude and preferring death in a hospice/palliative care unit. Those prioritising extending life had the highest home death preference of all groups. Health status did not affect priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Across all countries, extending life was prioritised by a minority, regardless of health status. Treatment and care needs to be reoriented with patient education and palliative care becoming mainstream for serious conditions such as cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision making; cross-cultural comparison; life extension; palliative care; quality of life
Authors: Abigail Baim-Lance; Katelyn B Ferreira; Harvey Jay Cohen; Susan S Ellenberg; George A Kuchel; Christine Ritchie; Greg A Sachs; Dalane Kitzman; R Sean Morrison; Albert Siu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher J Yarnell; Longdi Fu; Doug Manuel; Peter Tanuseputro; Therese Stukel; Ruxandra Pinto; Damon C Scales; Andreas Laupacis; Robert A Fowler Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Natalia Calanzani; Katrien Moens; Joachim Cohen; Irene J Higginson; Richard Harding; Luc Deliens; Franco Toscani; Pedro L Ferreira; Claudia Bausewein; Barbara A Daveson; Marjolein Gysels; Lucas Ceulemans; Barbara Gomes Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Jan Gaertner; Vera Weingärtner; Stefan Lange; Elke Hausner; Ansgar Gerhardus; Steffen T Simon; Raymond Voltz; Gerhild Becker; Norbert Schmacke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julia Downing; Barbara Gomes; Nancy Gikaara; Grace Munene; Barbara A Daveson; Richard A Powell; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Irene J Higginson; Richard Harding Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 3.234