Literature DB >> 23703090

Symmetry in the pigeon with sample and comparison stimuli in different locations.

Melissa Swisher1, Peter J Urcuioli.   

Abstract

Pigeons typically do not show evidence for symmetry in two-alternative matching-to-sample but do demonstrate this emergent relation in successive (go/no-go) matching-to-sample. Because the sample and comparison stimuli are presented in the same spatial location (viz., on one key) during successive matching training and testing, this may be one reason why pigeons pass tests for symmetry in this paradigm. To evaluate this, one group of pigeons received successive matching training with hue-sample stimuli on the center key and form-comparison stimuli on the left key of a three-key chamber. A control group was trained with all stimuli appearing on the same (left) key. Training also involved concurrent hue- and form-identity successive matching with the same spatial location arrangement as each group's respective hue-form task. Later, nonreinforced form-hue (symmetry) probes structured in the same way as the baseline trials were given. Of the six birds in each group, five trained with different locations and two trained with constant location responded more to the reverse of baseline positive hue-form combinations than to negative ones in testing. Results confirm the prediction from Urcuioli's (2008) theory that symmetry should emerge even with varying spatial locations, as long as functional stimuli are held constant. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  key peck; pigeons; stimulus equivalence; successive matching; symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23703090      PMCID: PMC5390681          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: Reflexivity or transitivity.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa Swisher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training.

Authors:  Andrea J Frank; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Control by sample location in pigeons' matching to sample.

Authors:  K M Lionello; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reflexivity in pigeons.

Authors:  Mary M Sweeney; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.

Authors:  Saulo M Velasco; Edson M Huziwara; Armando Machado; Gerson Y Tomanari
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa Swisher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  I H Iversen; M Sidman; P Carrigan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Evidence for response membership in stimulus classes by pigeons.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; B Max Jones; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  The search for symmetry: 25 years in review.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  ASSOCIATIVE CONCEPT LEARNING IN ANIMALS: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Edward A Wasserman; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Simultaneous learning of directional and non-directional stimulus relations in baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  Thomas F Chartier; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa J Swisher
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 5.  Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Luís Oliveira; Leonard Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.478

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.