Literature DB >> 23702728

A survey of immunohistochemical biomarkers for basal-like breast cancer against a gene expression profile gold standard.

Jennifer R Won1, Dongxia Gao, Christine Chow, Jinjin Cheng, Sherman Y H Lau, Matthew J Ellis, Charles M Perou, Philip S Bernard, Torsten O Nielsen.   

Abstract

Gene expression profiling of breast cancer delineates a particularly aggressive subtype referred to as 'basal-like', which comprises ∼15% of all breast cancers, afflicts younger women and is refractory to endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies. Immunohistochemical surrogate definitions for basal-like breast cancer, such as the clinical ER/PR/HER2 triple-negative phenotype and models incorporating positive expression for CK5 (CK5/6) and/or EGFR are heavily cited. However, many additional biomarkers for basal-like breast cancer have been described in the literature. A parallel comparison of 46 proposed immunohistochemical biomarkers of basal-like breast cancer was performed against a gene expression profile gold standard on a tissue microarray containing 42 basal-like and 80 non-basal-like breast cancer cases. Ki67 and PPH3 were the most sensitive biomarkers (both 92%) positively expressed in the basal-like subtype, whereas CK14, IMP3 and NGFR were the most specific (100%). Among biomarkers surveyed, loss of INPP4B (a negative regulator of phosphatidylinositol signaling) was 61% sensitive and 99% specific with the highest odds ratio (OR) at 108, indicating the strongest association with basal-like breast cancer. Expression of nestin, a common marker of neural progenitor cells that is also associated with the triple-negative/basal-like phenotype and poor breast cancer prognosis, possessed the second highest OR at 29 among the 46 biomarkers surveyed, as well as 54% sensitivity and 96% specificity. As a positively expressed biomarker, nestin possesses technical advantages over INPP4B that make it a more ideal biomarker for identification of basal-like breast cancer. The comprehensive immunohistochemical biomarker survey presented in this study is a necessary step for determining an optimized surrogate immunopanel that best defines basal-like breast cancer in a practical and clinically accessible way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23702728     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  19 in total

1.  Diagnosis of Basal-Like Breast Cancer Using a FOXC1-Based Assay.

Authors:  Tor W Jensen; Tania Ray; Jinhua Wang; Xiaodong Li; Wesley Y Naritoku; Bingchen Han; Frank Bellafiore; Sanjay P Bagaria; Annie Qu; Xiaojiang Cui; Clive R Taylor; Partha S Ray
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  IMP3 expression in gastric cancer: association with clinicopathological features and HER2 status.

Authors:  Emanuel Adelino M Damasceno; Fabiana Pirani Carneiro; Albino Verçosa de Magalhães; Marcos de Vasconcelos Carneiro; Gustavo Henrique Soares Takano; Leonora Maciel de Sousa Vianna; Heinrich Bender Kohnert Seidler; Tercia Maria Mendes Lousa de Castro; Maria Imaculada Muniz-Junqueira; Rivadávio Fernandes Batista Amorim; Vânia Maria Moraes Ferreira; Andrea Barreto Motoyama
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  INPP4B overexpression enhances the antitumor efficacy of PARP inhibitor AG014699 in MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Huan Ding; Xinguang Liu; Xiaoqing Li; Li Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-14

4.  Nestin expression in breast cancer: association with prognosis and subtype on 3641 cases with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Karama Asleh; Jennifer R Won; Dongxia Gao; K David Voduc; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Can PPH3 be helpful to assess the discordant grade in primary and metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

Authors:  Clotilde Dumars; Fanny Foubert; Yann Touchefeu; Nicolas Regenet; Hélène Senellart; Tamara Matysiak-Budnik; Marie-Françoise Heymann
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  The Discovery of Novel Biomarkers Improves Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype Prediction and Reconciles the Labels in the METABRIC Data Set.

Authors:  Heloisa Helena Milioli; Renato Vimieiro; Carlos Riveros; Inna Tishchenko; Regina Berretta; Pablo Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The biological function of IGF2BPs and their role in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Qiu-Ying Du; Zhi-Man Zhu; Dong-Sheng Pei
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Attempt towards a novel classification of triple-negative breast cancer using immunohistochemical markers.

Authors:  Yan-Xi Liu; Ke-Ren Wang; Hua Xing; Xu-Jie Zhai; Li-Ping Wang; Wan Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  SubID, a non-median dichotomization tool for heterogeneous populations, reveals the pan-cancer significance of INPP4B and its regulation by EVI1 in AML.

Authors:  Irakli Dzneladze; John F Woolley; Carla Rossell; Youqi Han; Ayesha Rashid; Michael Jain; Jüri Reimand; Mark D Minden; Leonardo Salmena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  CircRNA circFOXK2 facilitates oncogenesis in breast cancer via IGF2BP3/miR-370 axis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hui Liu; Junjie Jiang; Yunyun Yang; Wenjie Wang; Zhengyan Jia
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.