Literature DB >> 23702587

It is time to consider cultural differences in debriefing.

Hyun Soo Chung1, Peter Dieckmann, Saul Barry Issenberg.   

Abstract

SUMMARY STATEMENT: Debriefing plays a critical role in facilitated reflection of simulation after the experiential component of simulation-based learning. The concept of framing and reflective learning in a debriefing session has emanated primarily from Western cultures. However, non-Western cultures have significant characteristics that manifest themselves in teaching and learning practices substantially different from Western cultures. We need to consider how to balance standardization in debriefing with a culture-sensitive interpretation of simulation-based learning so that learners receive the maximum benefit from debriefing sessions. Our goal was to raise awareness of cultural differences and stimulate work to make progress in this regard.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23702587     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318291d9ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Resuscitation Education in Low-Middle-Income Countries: Effective Strategies for Successful Program Development.

Authors:  Julianna Jung; Nicole Shilkofski
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  Cultural considerations in debriefing: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Janice C Palaganas; Matthew Charnetski; Sharon Dowell; Albert Kam Ming Chan; Kim Leighton
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Significance of debriefing methods in simulation-based sedation training courses for medical safety improvement in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Takuro Sanuki; Shunsuke Fujiwara; Masanori Haba; Ryusuke Ueki; Yoshiroh Kaminoh; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  Impact of multi-professional, scenario-based training on postpartum hemorrhage in Tanzania: a quasi-experimental, pre- vs. post-intervention study.

Authors:  Signe Egenberg; Gileard Masenga; Lars Edvin Bru; Torbjørn Moe Eggebø; Cecilia Mushi; Deodatus Massay; Pål Øian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Use of simulation-based medical training in Swiss pediatric hospitals: a national survey.

Authors:  Martin Stocker; Kathryn Laine; Francis Ulmer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Implementation of a Rapid Post-Code Debrief Quality Improvement Project in a Community Emergency Department Setting.

Authors:  Tomasz Przednowek; Camille Stacey; Katherine Baird; Robert Nolan; Jesse Kellar; William D Corser
Journal:  Spartan Med Res J       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  Crisis Team Management in a Scarce Resource Setting: Angkor Hospital for Children in Siem Reap, Cambodia.

Authors:  Richard Alynn Henker; Hiroko Henker; Hor Eng; John O'Donnell; Tachawan Jirativanont
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-07-05

8.  Variation and adaptation: learning from success in patient safety-oriented simulation training.

Authors:  Peter Dieckmann; Mary Patterson; Saadi Lahlou; Jessica Mesman; Patrik Nyström; Ralf Krage
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-31

9.  The 2019 WACEM Expert Document on the Framework for Setting up a Simulation Centre.

Authors:  Fatimah Lateef; Shanqing Yin; Madhavi Suppiah
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2019-11-18

10.  Exploration of Cybercivility in Nursing Education Using Cross-Country Comparisons.

Authors:  Sang Suk Kim; Jung Jae Lee; Jennie C De Gagne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.