Literature DB >> 23702551

SuperQ: computing supernetworks from quartets.

Stefan Grünewald1, Andreas Spillner, Sarah Bastkowski, Anja Bögershausen, Vincent Moulton.   

Abstract

Supertrees are a commonly used tool in phylogenetics to summarize collections of partial phylogenetic trees. As a generalization of supertrees, phylogenetic supernetworks allow, in addition, the visual representation of conflict between the trees that is not possible to observe with a single tree. Here, we introduce SuperQ, a new method for constructing such supernetworks (SuperQ is freely available at >www.uea.ac.uk/computing/superq.). It works by first breaking the input trees into quartet trees, and then stitching these together to form a special kind of phylogenetic network, called a split network. This stitching process is performed using an adaptation of the QNet method for split network reconstruction employing a novel approach to use the branch lengths from the input trees to estimate the branch lengths in the resulting network. Compared with previous supernetwork methods, SuperQ has the advantage of producing a planar network. We compare the performance of SuperQ to the Z-closure and Q-imputation supernetwork methods, and also present an analysis of some published data sets as an illustration of its applicability.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23702551     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

1.  Phylogenomic resolution of scorpions reveals multilevel discordance with morphological phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Rosa Fernández; Lauren A Esposito; Edmundo González-Santillán; Lionel Monod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quartet-net: a quartet-based method to reconstruct phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Jialiang Yang; Stefan Grünewald; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Ordered phylogenomic subsampling enables diagnosis of systematic errors in the placement of the enigmatic arachnid order Palpigradi.

Authors:  Jesús A Ballesteros; Carlos E Santibáñez López; Ľubomír Kováč; Efrat Gavish-Regev; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A phylogenetic backbone for Bivalvia: an RNA-seq approach.

Authors:  Vanessa L González; Sónia C S Andrade; Rüdiger Bieler; Timothy M Collins; Casey W Dunn; Paula M Mikkelsen; John D Taylor; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Enumerating all maximal frequent subtrees in collections of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Akshay Deepak; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.405

6.  Exploring Phylogenetic Relationships within Myriapoda and the Effects of Matrix Composition and Occupancy on Phylogenomic Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rosa Fernández; Gregory D Edgecombe; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Unnoticed in the tropics: phylogenomic resolution of the poorly known arachnid order Ricinulei (Arachnida).

Authors:  Rosa Fernández; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Quartet-based methods to reconstruct phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Jialiang Yang; Stefan Grünewald; Yifei Xu; Xiu-Feng Wan
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Nuclear genomic signals of the 'microturbellarian' roots of platyhelminth evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  Christopher E Laumer; Andreas Hejnol; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Inferring Phylogenetic Networks with Maximum Pseudolikelihood under Incomplete Lineage Sorting.

Authors:  Claudia Solís-Lemus; Cécile Ané
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.