Jo Evershed1, Brendan Burkett2, Rebecca Mellifont1. 1. School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: bburkett@usc.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of asymmetry of clinical strength musculoskeletal screening measures and 3D kinematic movements on bilateral hand-force performance measures in swimmers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: 32 national-ranked junior swimmers, 100 m freestyle time (mean (SD), 60.68 s (4.81)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Screened clinical strength, kinematic movements, and bilateral hand-force were measured. Asymmetry was defined as a percentage difference greater than 10 percent, either left (negative) or right (positive) for all variables. RESULTS: Asymmetry of the clinical strength measures was found in ∼85% of swimmers. Athletes with symmetry of all clinical strength measures displayed symmetrical bilateral hand force production. Approximately 50% of clinically asymmetrical swimmers were able to compensate, due to summated muscle symmetry and/or an altered kinematic movement pattern, and generate symmetrical hand force. CONCLUSIONS: Symmetry of clinical strength was directly related to symmetrical force output. It is important to connect the clinical screening results to the sport-specific performance measures to ensure functional and valid screening is undertaken. Clinicians should aim for symmetry of strength in order to minimise the requirement for compensatory strategies.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of asymmetry of clinical strength musculoskeletal screening measures and 3D kinematic movements on bilateral hand-force performance measures in swimmers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Institutional. PARTICIPANTS: 32 national-ranked junior swimmers, 100 m freestyle time (mean (SD), 60.68 s (4.81)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Screened clinical strength, kinematic movements, and bilateral hand-force were measured. Asymmetry was defined as a percentage difference greater than 10 percent, either left (negative) or right (positive) for all variables. RESULTS: Asymmetry of the clinical strength measures was found in ∼85% of swimmers. Athletes with symmetry of all clinical strength measures displayed symmetrical bilateral hand force production. Approximately 50% of clinically asymmetrical swimmers were able to compensate, due to summated muscle symmetry and/or an altered kinematic movement pattern, and generate symmetrical hand force. CONCLUSIONS: Symmetry of clinical strength was directly related to symmetrical force output. It is important to connect the clinical screening results to the sport-specific performance measures to ensure functional and valid screening is undertaken. Clinicians should aim for symmetry of strength in order to minimise the requirement for compensatory strategies.
Authors: Karini B Dos Santos; Paulo C Barauce Bento; Gleber Pereira; Carl Payton; André L F Rodacki Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Kaitlyn R Schlueter; Joshua A Pintar; Katherine J Wayman; Lynda J Hartel; Matthew S Briggs Journal: Sports Health Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Catarina C Santos; Luís M Rama; Daniel A Marinho; Tiago M Barbosa; Mário J Costa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Diogo D Carvalho; Susana Soares; Rodrigo Zacca; Daniel A Marinho; António J Silva; David B Pyne; J Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo J Fernandes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390