Literature DB >> 23702230

Dilatation of the remaining aorta after aortic valve or aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a 5-year follow-up.

Nada Abdulkareem1, Gopal Soppa, Siôn Jones, Oswaldo Valencia, Jeremy Smelt, Marjan Jahangiri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The natural history and management of ascending aorta (AA) and arch dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) or aortic root replacement (ARR) remains controversial. Our aim is to identify dilatation of the remaining aorta after AVR or ARR in patients with BAV compared with patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).
METHODS: Three hundred ninety-five patients who underwent AVR or ARR between 2002 and 2009 were studied. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and echocardiography were performed in 192 patients with BAV, and the results were compared with those of 203 patients with TAV. An AA diameter 4.5 cm or greater was regarded as aneurysmal. Postoperative echocardiograms, computed tomographic scans, and magnetic resonance images were compared with subsequent imaging at a median follow-up of 4.6 years (2.2-9.8 years). RESULT: Median ages of patients with BAV and patients with TAV were 57 ± 14 and 65 ± 16 years, respectively (p < 0.05). Preoperative diameter of AA in the BAV group with no aneurysm (3.5 cm; range, 3.0-4.0 cm; n = 143) was significantly higher than in the TAV group (3.3 cm; range, 3.1-3.8 cm; n = 129) (p < 0.001). In both BAV and TAV groups with nonaneurysmal aortas who underwent AVR, there was no significant expansion of the AA and arch at 5 years' follow-up. In patients with aneurysmal aorta (BAV group, n = 49; TAV group, n = 74) who underwent ARR, there was also no significant difference in growth of the remaining aorta at 3 and 5 years' follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant dilatation of the AA or arch was observed after AVR or ARR, respectively, in patients when a cut-off diameter of 4.5 cm or greater was considered for replacement in patients with BAV compared with patients with TAV up to 5 years after operation. The need for aortic replacement at smaller diameters was not found.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23702230     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Gender-dependent aortic remodelling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve-associated thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Jiwon Lee; Mengcheng Shen; Nirmal Parajuli; Gavin Y Oudit; Michael Sean McMurtry; Zamaneh Kassiri
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  Functional assessment of thoracic aortic aneurysms - the future of risk prediction?

Authors:  Pouya Youssefi; Rajan Sharma; C Alberto Figueroa; Marjan Jahangiri
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Dilatation of the initially non-aneurysmal ascending aorta after replacement of a bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Guangpu Fan; Hui Zhao; Xu Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Peide Zhang; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  Pathogenic Mechanisms of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

Authors:  Noor M Yassine; Jasmine T Shahram; Simon C Body
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Differential flow improvements after valve replacements in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment.

Authors:  Malenka M Bissell; Margaret Loudon; Aaron T Hess; Victoria Stoll; Elizabeth Orchard; Stefan Neubauer; Saul G Myerson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Plasma proteomic profiling reveals biomarkers associated with aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Wenrui Ma; Jingjing Zhang; Kehua Xu; Shiqiang Yan; Dingqian Liu; Hui Huang; Yuyi Tang; Guoquan Yan; Yongxin Sun; Jun Li; Weijia Zhang; Chunsheng Wang; Kai Zhu; Hao Lai
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  Commentary: In the absence of convincing evidence, more is not better.

Authors:  Matheus P Falasa; George J Arnaoutakis; Thomas M Beaver
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-12-31

8.  Should all patients with aortic aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve also undergo hemiarch?

Authors:  Isao Anzai; Jacob Kriegel; Ilya Kim; Christian Pearsall; Matthew Lewis; Marlon Rosenbaum; Giovanni Ferrari; Isaac George; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-02-16

9.  Ascending Aorta Diameter Changes after Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Jiamiao Gong; Kang An; Hongyuan Lin; Jianfeng Hou
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 10.  Impact of Valve Morphology on the Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Poggio; Laura Cavallotti; Paola Songia; Alessandro Di Minno; Pasquale Ambrosino; Liborio Mammana; Alessandro Parolari; Francesco Alamanni; Elena Tremoli; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.