OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the performance of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for the screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We selected participants from a medical center in Taiwan, China from November 2009 to June 2011. All participants underwent screening colonoscopy and were asked to provide their stool samples for qualitative immunochemical FOBT (qlFIT), quantitative immunochemical FOBT (qnFIT) and the guaiac-based FOBT(GT). The receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized to determine the optimal cut-off value of qnFIT. We measured the detection ability of the FOBT for colonic polypoid lesions. RESULTS: In all, 699 participants were enrolled in this study. For qnFIT, we found increased levels of fecal hemoglobin in participants with polyps ≥10 mm (251.0 ng/mL), villous-containing adenomas (98.7 ng/mL) and advanced adenomas (187.9 ng/mL). The optimal cut-off value for qnFIT was 25 ng/mL for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms (ACRN). All three FOBT had a similar but low estimate in detecting small and tubular adenomatous polyps. The qnFIT had a better detection ability for large adenomas (positive likelihood ratio [PLR], 5.6 vs 3.1 vs 0.3) and adenomas with villous-components (PLR 3.7 vs 3.3 vs 0.3) than qlFIT and GT. For the ACRN group, qnFIT also showed the best screening ability with a sensitivity of 56.8%, accuracy of 86.7% and PLR 5.0. CONCLUSIONS: Both qnFIT and qlFIT perform better than GT in detecting advanced adenomas and CRC in the Taiwanese population.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the performance of fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for the screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We selected participants from a medical center in Taiwan, China from November 2009 to June 2011. All participants underwent screening colonoscopy and were asked to provide their stool samples for qualitative immunochemical FOBT (qlFIT), quantitative immunochemical FOBT (qnFIT) and the guaiac-based FOBT(GT). The receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized to determine the optimal cut-off value of qnFIT. We measured the detection ability of the FOBT for colonic polypoid lesions. RESULTS: In all, 699 participants were enrolled in this study. For qnFIT, we found increased levels of fecal hemoglobin in participants with polyps ≥10 mm (251.0 ng/mL), villous-containing adenomas (98.7 ng/mL) and advanced adenomas (187.9 ng/mL). The optimal cut-off value for qnFIT was 25 ng/mL for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms (ACRN). All three FOBT had a similar but low estimate in detecting small and tubular adenomatous polyps. The qnFIT had a better detection ability for large adenomas (positive likelihood ratio [PLR], 5.6 vs 3.1 vs 0.3) and adenomas with villous-components (PLR 3.7 vs 3.3 vs 0.3) than qlFIT and GT. For the ACRN group, qnFIT also showed the best screening ability with a sensitivity of 56.8%, accuracy of 86.7% and PLR 5.0. CONCLUSIONS: Both qnFIT and qlFIT perform better than GT in detecting advanced adenomas and CRC in the Taiwanese population.